Sermons on Psalm 14:1


The various sermons below converge on the understanding that the term "fool" in Psalm 14:1 is primarily a moral and existential judgment rather than an intellectual insult. They emphasize that denying God is less about lacking evidence or intellectual capacity and more about a willful suppression of an innate knowledge of God and conscience present in every human heart. This denial is portrayed as a universal human condition, cutting across social and educational boundaries, and is often linked to a corrupted or enslaved mind influenced by sin. Several sermons highlight the distinction between knowledge and wisdom, underscoring that true wisdom begins with the fear of the Lord. The idea of practical atheism—living as if God does not exist regardless of verbal profession—is a recurring theme, broadening the scope of "foolishness" beyond explicit atheism to include subtle forms of denial. Analogies such as gambling one’s eternal destiny on insufficient evidence, the development of spiritual taste, and the distortion of memory and judgment by sin enrich the interpretation, while some sermons caution against using the passage as a weapon, instead urging compassion and invitation.

In contrast, the sermons diverge in their theological emphases and pastoral applications. Some focus heavily on the moral and heart-centered nature of atheism, framing it as a rebellion motivated by a desire for autonomy and independence from God, while others stress the cognitive corruption caused by sin that impairs true critical thinking and freedom. One approach categorizes the denial of God into nuanced types, including metaphysical, experiential, and heretical denials, expanding the concept of atheism beyond mere disbelief. Another sermon uniquely connects the denial of God to the rejection of objective reality itself, critiquing modern existentialism and radical subjectivism as foundational errors that lead to a malleable, self-defined meaning of life. While some emphasize the universal suppression of God’s truth as a heart issue, others highlight the practical implications of living as if God is irrelevant, even among professing believers. The pastoral tone also varies, with some urging a posture of compassionate invitation rather than condemnation, and others focusing on the necessity of divine initiative for true worship and understanding.


Psalm 14:1 Interpretation:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) offers a unique interpretation of Psalm 14:1 by emphasizing that the biblical term "fool" is not an insult to intelligence but a moral and existential assessment. The sermon delves into the original Hebrew nuance, explaining that "fool" (nabal) refers to someone who is superficial, lacking in true understanding, and governed by desires rather than reason or conscience. The preacher draws a sharp distinction between knowledge and wisdom, arguing that the denial of God is not a product of intellectual rigor but of a willful suppression of innate knowledge and conscience. He also highlights the universality of the statement, noting that the psalmist makes no exceptions—every person who denies God is described as a fool, regardless of their education or social standing. This interpretation is further enriched by the analogy of the fool as someone who risks everything on insufficient evidence, likening atheism to gambling one's eternal destiny on a flimsy bet.

Understanding Our Existence: Created by God's Desire (Ligonier Ministries) interprets Psalm 14:1 with a distinctive apologetic and pastoral approach. The sermon asserts that atheism is not a genuine intellectual position but a suppression of the truth that God has placed in every human heart. The preacher draws on the original context of the psalm to argue that the "fool" is not merely mistaken but is actively rejecting what he knows to be true about God, motivated by a desire for autonomy and a dislike of divine interference. The analogy of taste and appetite is used to illustrate how spiritual perception matures, suggesting that the rejection of God is akin to refusing to develop a palate for what is truly good. The sermon also cautions Christians against using Psalm 14:1 as a weapon to insult atheists, instead urging a posture of compassion and invitation.

True Freedom: Overcoming Sin's Deceptive Pleasures (MLJTrust) provides a novel angle by connecting Psalm 14:1 to the broader biblical theme of the mind's corruption by sin. The preacher interprets the "fool" as one whose mind has become empty, uncritical, prejudiced, and debased due to sin. He argues that the denial of God is not a triumph of reason but a symptom of a mind enslaved to desire and propaganda, unable to exercise true critical thought or appreciate higher principles like freedom and dignity. This interpretation is illustrated through the story of the Israelites longing for Egypt, showing how sin distorts memory and judgment, making people value fleeting pleasures over lasting truths.

Humanity's Fallenness and God's Salvation in Psalm 14 (David Guzik) offers a detailed interpretation of Psalm 14:1, emphasizing that the Hebrew word for "fool" (nabal) refers primarily to moral, not intellectual, foolishness. Guzik highlights the distinction between theoretical atheism (intellectual denial of God) and practical atheism (living as if God does not exist), noting that the original Hebrew omits "there is," so the phrase can be read as "No God for me," which underscores a willful rejection of God rather than a mere intellectual position. He also draws attention to the use of italics in English translations, which can obscure the original force of the Hebrew. Guzik uses the analogy of practical atheism to describe those who may profess belief in God but live as if He is irrelevant, and he explores the heart as the locus of this denial, suggesting that the rejection is rooted in moral resistance rather than lack of evidence or intelligence.

Recognizing God: The Dangers of Practical Atheism (Desiring God) interprets Psalm 14:1 by exploring the concept of "practical atheism," arguing that the fool's denial of God is not limited to explicit atheism but includes living as if God is irrelevant to daily life. The sermon introduces five nuanced ways people suppress the knowledge of God: metaphysical denial (God does not exist), non-effective denial (God does not act), non-experiential denial (God is irrelevant to my experience), non-worthy denial (God is not worthy of attention), and heretical denial (believing in a false god). This multi-layered approach expands the meaning of the text beyond a simple intellectual denial, suggesting that the suppression of God's reality is a universal human tendency manifesting in various forms.

Discovering the Author's Intent in Biblical Texts (Desiring God) uses Psalm 14:1 as a springboard to discuss the folly of subjective reality, drawing a parallel between the fool's denial of God and the modern tendency to define one's own reality and meaning. The sermon uniquely connects the denial of God in Psalm 14:1 to the rejection of objective truth and the embrace of radical subjectivism, using the example of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's statement about defining one's own concept of existence. The preacher argues that denying God's existence leads to a world where all meaning is malleable, and objective reality is lost, thus making the fool's statement not just a theological error but a foundational error about the nature of reality itself.

Psalm 14:1 Theological Themes:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) introduces the theme that the denial of God is fundamentally a moral and existential folly, not an intellectual one. The sermon explores the idea that all humans possess an innate sense of God and conscience, and that atheism is a suppression of these internal witnesses. It also presents the theme that true wisdom begins with the fear of the Lord, and that risking one's eternal destiny on insufficient evidence is the height of folly.

Understanding Our Existence: Created by God's Desire (Ligonier Ministries) adds the theological theme that atheism is ultimately a heart issue rather than a head issue. The preacher emphasizes that all people know God exists because God has made it plain to them, but some suppress this truth out of a desire for independence. The sermon also introduces the idea that spiritual understanding is a gift from God, and that belief in God is not merely intellectual assent but a transformation of the heart and senses.

True Freedom: Overcoming Sin's Deceptive Pleasures (MLJTrust) presents the theme that sin not only corrupts behavior but also debilitates the mind, making people incapable of true critical thought or honest self-assessment. The sermon highlights how sin leads to an empty, uncritical, and prejudiced mind, and that true freedom and understanding can only be restored through Christ.

Humanity's Fallenness and God's Salvation in Psalm 14 (David Guzik) introduces the theme that the denial of God is fundamentally a moral issue, not an intellectual one, and that practical atheism is as much a problem as theoretical atheism. Guzik also develops the idea that the corruption and lack of goodness in humanity are universal, not limited to explicit atheists, and that even believers can act as "practical atheists" when they live as if God's promises are not true. He further explores the theme that all human attempts to seek God apart from divine initiative result in idolatry rather than true worship, challenging the assumption that religious activity equates to genuine seeking of God.

Recognizing God: The Dangers of Practical Atheism (Desiring God) presents a distinct theological theme by categorizing the suppression of God's reality into five types, thereby showing that atheism is not merely a matter of explicit denial but can be present in various subtle forms, including religious distortion. The sermon also asserts that all people, regardless of their claims, possess an innate knowledge of God, which they actively suppress, making atheism a universal human problem rather than a rare intellectual position.

Discovering the Author's Intent in Biblical Texts (Desiring God) introduces the theological theme that denying God is tantamount to denying objective reality itself, leading to a worldview where all meaning is self-created and subjective. This sermon uniquely frames Psalm 14:1 as a critique of modern existentialism and the loss of absolute truth, arguing that true liberty and knowledge are found in submitting to God's revealed reality rather than inventing one's own.

Psalm 14:1 Historical and Contextual Insights:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) provides historical context by noting that the denial of God is not a modern phenomenon but has existed since ancient times. The preacher points out that even in King David's era, people were saying "there is no God," debunking the notion that atheism is a product of modern scientific knowledge. He also references the universality of religious belief across primitive tribes and cultures, arguing that the sense of God is a constant in human history.

True Freedom: Overcoming Sin's Deceptive Pleasures (MLJTrust) offers contextual insight by connecting the mindset of the "fool" in Psalm 14:1 to the experience of the Israelites in the wilderness. The preacher explains how their longing for the pleasures of Egypt, despite their former slavery, illustrates the debasement of judgment and memory caused by sin—a pattern that the psalmist identifies as folly.

Humanity's Fallenness and God's Salvation in Psalm 14 (David Guzik) provides historical context by noting that in David's time, the denial of God was not primarily an intellectual stance but a moral and volitional one. Guzik explains that the Hebrew context of "fool" (nabal) was understood as someone who was morally deficient, not lacking in intelligence, and that the practical outworking of this denial was a rejection of God's moral authority and a desire to live without divine accountability. He also references the role of the "chief musician" in ancient Israel, suggesting that the psalm was intended for public worship and possibly directed to God as the ultimate musician, which situates the psalm within the liturgical and communal life of Israel.

Psalm 14:1 Cross-References in the Bible:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) references several biblical passages to expand on Psalm 14:1. The preacher cites Romans 1 to show that people suppress the truth about God despite clear evidence in creation. He also references the story of the prodigal son as an illustration of someone who rejects God for fleeting pleasures, only to find emptiness and regret. The sermon draws on the Old Testament prophecies and their fulfillment in Christ as evidence for God's existence and involvement in history, and mentions 1 Corinthians ("the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom") to reinforce the link between wisdom and reverence for God.

Understanding Our Existence: Created by God's Desire (Ligonier Ministries) makes extensive use of Romans 1:18-25 to support the claim that all people know God but suppress the truth in unrighteousness. The preacher also references Psalm 53 (a parallel to Psalm 14), 1 Corinthians (spiritual things are spiritually discerned), and James (even demons believe and shudder) to illustrate the difference between mere belief in God and true faith. The sermon further alludes to the trilemma argument (liar, lunatic, or Lord) as articulated by C.S. Lewis, and references the testimony of Jesus and the apostles regarding the reliability of the Old Testament.

Humanity's Fallenness and God's Salvation in Psalm 14 (David Guzik) references several biblical passages to expand on Psalm 14:1. He cites Romans 1, where Paul discusses humanity's suppression of the knowledge of God and the resulting moral decline, suggesting that Paul may have had Psalm 14 in mind when writing about those who "profess to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:22). Guzik also references John 3:20 to explain the moral motivation behind rejecting God ("everyone practicing evil hates the light"), and 1 Samuel 27:1 to illustrate how even David, the psalmist, could act as a "practical atheist" by doubting God's promises. Additionally, he mentions Acts 17:28 ("in him we live and move and have our being") to underscore humanity's dependence on God, and he draws a Christological connection by noting that Jesus is the opposite of fallen humanity as described in Psalm 14.

Recognizing God: The Dangers of Practical Atheism (Desiring God) cross-references Psalm 10:3-4, which describes the wicked as those who say "there is no God" in their thoughts, and Romans 1:18-23, where Paul asserts that all people know God but suppress this knowledge in unrighteousness. The sermon also references Psalm 19, which proclaims that the heavens declare God's glory, reinforcing the idea that God's existence is evident in creation. These cross-references are used to argue that the denial of God is a suppression of evident truth, not a lack of evidence, and that this suppression takes multiple forms.

Discovering the Author's Intent in Biblical Texts (Desiring God) references Exodus 3:13-14 ("I am who I am") to establish God's absolute reality, Hebrews 1:1-3 to affirm that God created and upholds the universe through Christ, and Ephesians 3:3-4 to highlight the revelatory nature of Scripture. These passages are used to support the claim that reality and meaning are grounded in God's existence and revelation, and that denying God (as in Psalm 14:1) is a denial of the very foundation of objective truth.

Psalm 14:1 Christian References outside the Bible:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) explicitly references Isaac Newton and Blaise Pascal as examples of great scientific minds who were also devout believers, countering the claim that disbelief in God is a mark of intelligence. The preacher also alludes to the works of secular historians and benefactors whose faith motivated their contributions to society, such as the founders of hospitals and social reformers like Wilberforce.

Understanding Our Existence: Created by God's Desire (Ligonier Ministries) explicitly cites modern Christian apologists and scholars such as Mike Kruger, Dan Wallace, and J. Warner Wallace in support of the reliability of the New Testament manuscripts. The preacher also references the trilemma argument popularized by C.S. Lewis and Rabbi John Duncan, and quotes Jonathan Edwards on the concept of a "new sense" or "taste" for spiritual things.

Humanity's Fallenness and God's Salvation in Psalm 14 (David Guzik) explicitly references Charles Spurgeon, quoting his reflections on the "counsel of the poor" and his exhortation to Christians who are mocked for their faith. Spurgeon is cited as saying, "you can be laughed into hell but you can never be laughed out of it," which Guzik uses to encourage believers to stand firm in their faith despite ridicule. Spurgeon's insights are used to illustrate the practical implications of Psalm 14:1 for believers facing opposition.

Psalm 14:1 Illustrations from Secular Sources:

Understanding Our Relationship with God: The Ultimate Question (MLJTrust) uses the example of Isaac Newton, not only as a scientist but as someone who devoted more time to studying Scripture and prophecy than to his scientific work. The preacher also references the founding of hospitals by religious men, such as St. Bartholomew's Hospital in London, to illustrate the positive impact of faith in God on society.

Understanding Our Existence: Created by God's Desire (Ligonier Ministries) draws on a variety of secular sources and cultural references. The preacher discusses the manuscript evidence for ancient authors like Homer, Aristotle, and Plato, comparing the abundance of New Testament manuscripts to the relative scarcity of classical texts. He also references secular historians and antagonists of Christianity, such as Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, and Josephus, who attest to the historical reality of Jesus and the early church. Additionally, the sermon uses the analogy of developing a taste for certain foods (broccoli, tomatoes, onions, sushi, mushrooms) to illustrate how spiritual appetites mature over time, making the point accessible and relatable to a broad audience.

Discovering the Author's Intent in Biblical Texts (Desiring God) provides a detailed secular illustration by referencing Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's statement in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992): "At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life." The sermon uses this quote to exemplify the modern mindset that rejects objective reality in favor of self-defined meaning, drawing a direct parallel to the folly described in Psalm 14:1. The preacher argues that this approach leads to a world where all meaning is malleable and subjective, thus illustrating the contemporary relevance of the psalm's warning against denying God's existence.