Sermons on Romans 3:19-20


The various sermons below converge on the interpretation of Romans 3:19-20 as a pivotal moment where human self-justification is decisively silenced before the holiness and judgment of God. They consistently emphasize the law’s role as a diagnostic tool that exposes sin universally, rendering all mouths stopped and all excuses invalid. A recurring nuance is the distinction between justification as a divine declaration versus an internal moral transformation, with several sermons highlighting the concept of righteousness being “declared” or “imputed” rather than “made.” The courtroom metaphor is widely employed to illustrate the objective nature of guilt and the futility of relying on religious or moral credentials. Another common thread is the law’s function not as a means of salvation but as a “schoolmaster” or “mouth-stopper” that drives sinners to Christ by revealing their inability to meet God’s standard. Some sermons deepen this by exploring the theological implications of justification, such as the double imputation of sin and righteousness, the synthetic nature of justification, and the distinction between pardon and justification as a positive declaration of innocence. The law’s role is also portrayed as both universal and experiential, not only defining sin but provoking and multiplying it in the human heart, thus underscoring the necessity of grace.

In contrast, the sermons diverge in their theological emphases and illustrative frameworks. Some focus heavily on the legal and forensic aspects of justification, stressing the courtroom setting and the objective status of guilt, while others incorporate psychological and experiential dimensions, such as the law’s provocation of sin or the searing of conscience. A few sermons uniquely frame the law as a “black velvet” backdrop or a “velvet” setting that makes the gospel’s “diamond” brilliance stand out, adding a metaphorical richness absent in others. The treatment of the law’s scope varies as well: some sermons emphasize its universal application beyond Israel, while others highlight its original covenantal context but insist on its global implications. Theological nuances also differ, with some sermons delving into the Reformation’s synthetic view of justification and the alien righteousness of Christ, while others caution against superficial or Pharisaical readings of the law. Additionally, the pastoral application ranges from warnings about shallow conversions due to neglecting the law’s convicting power to detailed expositions on the law’s inability to justify due to human depravity. The use of metaphors varies widely—from courtroom barcodes and speeding tickets to school grades and forbidden postcards—each shaping the understanding of the law’s function and the believer’s need for grace in distinct ways.


Romans 3:19-20 Interpretation:

Reforming Grace: Embracing Forgiveness and Hope (Trinity Lutheran of Fort Pierce) interprets Romans 3:19-20 as a moment of utter spiritual reckoning, using the metaphor of “every mouth stopped” to describe the end of all human excuses and self-justification before God. The sermon draws a vivid parallel to Martin Luther’s personal crisis, emphasizing that the law’s purpose is to bring us to a place of silence and helplessness, where we can no longer rationalize or rename our sin. The preacher highlights the Greek term for righteousness, “dikaios,” and notes Luther’s realization that righteousness is not something we achieve but something God declares over us—“not made, but declared.” This declaration is likened to God’s creative word in Genesis: just as God says “let there be light” and there is light, so too when God says “you are not guilty,” it becomes true. This insight is presented as a radical shift from viewing righteousness as an internal change to understanding it as a divine verdict.

"Not So Fast, Good Person (Part 3)" (Calvary New Spring) offers a detailed, step-by-step exposition of Romans 3:19-20, using the analogy of a courtroom and the metaphor of a “barcode” for privilege to illustrate the futility of relying on religious or moral credentials. The sermon uniquely explores the linguistic nuance of “under the law,” clarifying that it means being held to the law’s full standard, not merely observing civil rules. The preacher also draws attention to the word “justified,” explaining its repeated use in Romans and distinguishing it from mere pardon—justification is a declaration of innocence, not just forgiveness. The sermon further unpacks the phrase “every mouth may be stopped,” emphasizing that at God’s judgment, all arguments and self-defenses will be silenced, and the law’s true function is to reveal sin, not to save.

Understanding Guilt: Aligning with God's Standards (Ligonier Ministries) interprets Romans 3:19-20 through the lens of objective guilt versus subjective guilt feelings. The sermon uses the metaphor of a courtroom to explain that guilt is not about how we feel but about the objective reality of having broken God’s law. The preacher draws a sharp distinction between civil law and God’s law, arguing that only the latter truly defines guilt. The “stopping of every mouth” is seen as the end of all rationalizations and excuses, exposing everyone’s universal accountability before God.

Justification by Faith: Understanding God's Righteousness in Christ (Ligonier Ministries) provides a theologically rich interpretation, focusing on the metaphor of the “stopped mouth” as the utter futility of self-justification before God’s holiness. The sermon delves into the debate over the meaning of “deeds of the law,” arguing that Paul refers not only to ritual or ceremonial works but to all moral and cultic obligations. The preacher distinguishes between pardon and justification, emphasizing that justification is a positive declaration of righteousness, not merely the removal of guilt. The sermon also introduces the concepts of propitiation and expiation, using the structure of the cross as a metaphor for the vertical (Godward) and horizontal (removal of sin) aspects of Christ’s work.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) interprets Romans 3:19-20 by using the vivid analogy of a school grading system, where all humanity receives an "F" except for Jesus, who alone earns an "A." Begg emphasizes that the law is not a ladder to climb to heaven but a diagnostic tool that exposes our inability to meet God's standard, silencing all self-justification. He uniquely frames the law as a "black velvet" backdrop that makes the "diamond" of the gospel shine, and insists that the law's purpose is to close every mouth and make the whole world accountable, not to provide a means of self-improvement. He also draws a sharp distinction between being "declared" righteous (justification) and being "made" righteous, clarifying that justification is a legal pronouncement, not a process of moral transformation. This sermon stands out for its extended metaphor of grades and its insistence that the law's function is to drive us to Christ by revealing our utter inability.

Justification by Faith Alone: The Heart of the Gospel (Ligonier Ministries) offers a unique interpretive angle by contrasting the Roman Catholic "analytical" view of justification (God declares someone righteous only if they are inherently righteous) with the Reformation's "synthetic" view (God declares someone righteous by adding Christ's righteousness to them). The sermon uses the Latin phrase simul justus et peccator ("at the same time righteous and sinner") to explain that believers are simultaneously justified by imputation and yet still sinners in themselves. The preacher also introduces the concept of "alien righteousness" (justitia alienum), meaning the righteousness that justifies is entirely outside of us, belonging to Christ and credited to us. This linguistic and philosophical distinction is a notable and deep interpretive contribution.

From Condemnation to Grace: Embracing God's Righteousness (Desiring God) interprets Romans 3:19-20 by focusing on the law's negative function: it condemns, kills, and reveals sin but cannot justify or produce faith. The sermon uses the analogy of "lesson books"—nature, conscience, and Israel's history—as three witnesses that silence every mouth before God. The preacher insists that the law's inability to justify is not due to any defect in the law itself, but in human "flesh" (rebellious nature), and that the law's ultimate purpose is to drive us to seek righteousness from God through faith in Christ. The unique contribution here is the threefold "lesson book" analogy and the emphasis on the law's global, not merely Jewish, application.

Understanding the Law's Role in Embracing the Gospel (Desiring God) provides a detailed, stepwise logical analysis of Romans 3:19-20, arguing that the law, though addressed to Jews, ultimately silences every mouth in the world because it exposes the universal inability to be justified by works. The preacher uses an original analogy involving a child and a forbidden postcard to illustrate how the law provokes and exposes sin in the human heart, not merely by defining it but by stirring up rebellion. This sermon is notable for its careful logical reconstruction of Paul's argument and its psychological insight into how the law interacts with human nature.

Interpreting Scripture: Heart, Law, and Truth (Desiring God) interprets Romans 3:19-20 by highlighting that the law, though given to Israel, is designed to stop every mouth and make the whole world accountable. The sermon uniquely frames the law as a signpost that points away from itself to Christ, insisting that a right reading of the law will always lead to the realization that justification cannot come by law-keeping. The preacher also draws on Jesus' use of Hosea 6:6 to show that the law's true purpose is often missed by those who read it superficially.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) offers a distinctive interpretation of Romans 3:19-20 by emphasizing the law’s function as a “mouth-stopper” and universal guilt-bringer, not just for Jews but for the entire world. The sermon uses the analogy of a speeding ticket and a parachute to illustrate that the law’s purpose is to make people aware of their guilt and need for salvation, rather than to justify or improve their lives. The preacher highlights the Greek phrase “now we know” at the start of Romans 3:19, lamenting that much of the church does not actually “know” or apply this truth. The law is described as a “schoolmaster” (Galatians 3:24) that drives sinners to Christ, and the sermon repeatedly stresses that the law’s role is to expose sin and prevent self-justification, not to provide comfort or self-improvement. The unique parachute metaphor is used to contrast false motives for coming to Christ (improving one’s life) with the true motive (escaping judgment), reinforcing the interpretation that the law’s exposure of sin is essential for genuine conversion.

Romans 3:19-20 Theological Themes:

Reforming Grace: Embracing Forgiveness and Hope (Trinity Lutheran of Fort Pierce) introduces the theme that justification is a divine declaration rather than a human achievement, rooted in God’s creative and performative word. The sermon presents the idea that forgiveness and righteousness occur in the mind of God, not in the subjective experience of the believer, paralleling the act of creation itself. This theme is further developed by contrasting the medieval church’s transactional view of grace with Luther’s rediscovery of grace as a free, unmerited gift.

"Not So Fast, Good Person (Part 3)" (Calvary New Spring) adds the nuanced theme that the law’s primary function is diagnostic, not therapeutic—it reveals sin and incapacitates self-justification, paving the way for the gospel. The sermon also explores the idea that both religious and irreligious people are equally condemned, and that the law’s exposure of sin is meant to drive all to the same place of need before God. The preacher’s distinction between “justified” and “pardoned” adds a fresh facet, highlighting that justification is a positive status granted by God, not just the absence of punishment.

Understanding Guilt: Aligning with God's Standards (Ligonier Ministries) presents the distinct theme that guilt is an objective status before God, not a subjective feeling, and that modern culture’s confusion between the two leads to moral relativism and the erosion of true accountability. The sermon’s exploration of conscience, and its capacity to be seared or misinformed, adds a layer of psychological and spiritual depth to the understanding of Romans 3:19-20.

Justification by Faith: Understanding God's Righteousness in Christ (Ligonier Ministries) develops the theme that justification is not only the forgiveness of sins but the positive imputation of Christ’s righteousness. The sermon’s discussion of propitiation and expiation, and the necessity of both Christ’s active and passive obedience, provides a comprehensive theological framework for understanding how God remains just while justifying sinners.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) introduces the theme that the law's primary function is to silence all self-justification and boasting, making every person equally accountable before God, regardless of religious background or moral effort. Begg adds the facet that the law is a "velvet" backdrop for the "diamond" of the gospel, and that only when we accept our "F" can we receive Christ's "A," thus making justification a matter of divine exchange rather than human achievement.

Justification by Faith Alone: The Heart of the Gospel (Ligonier Ministries) presents the distinct theological theme of "double imputation": our sin is imputed to Christ, and his righteousness is imputed to us. The sermon also introduces the Reformation's insistence on "alien righteousness" and the synthetic nature of justification, which is not based on inherent transformation but on a legal declaration grounded in Christ's merit alone. The simul justus et peccator concept is also a unique theological contribution, emphasizing the believer's dual status.

From Condemnation to Grace: Embracing God's Righteousness (Desiring God) adds the theme that the law's inability to justify is not a flaw in the law but a reflection of human depravity ("flesh"), and that the law's global witness (through Israel's failure) demonstrates that no one, regardless of privilege, can be justified by works. The preacher's assertion that the law's condemnation is a universal curriculum, more important than any secular education, is a fresh application.

Understanding the Law's Role in Embracing the Gospel (Desiring God) brings out the theme that the law's exposure of sin is not merely informational but experiential—it stirs up and multiplies sin in the unregenerate heart, making justification by works impossible. The preacher's analogy of the law as a provocation (the forbidden postcard) adds a psychological dimension to the theological theme.

Interpreting Scripture: Heart, Law, and Truth (Desiring God) uniquely emphasizes that a lawful use of the law always points away from itself to Christ, and that the law's ultimate function is to confront us with our sin and drive us to seek justification outside ourselves. The sermon also highlights the importance of reading the law in light of the gospel and the danger of superficial or Pharisaical interpretation.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) introduces the theme that the abandonment of the law in modern evangelism has led to shallow conversions and high rates of apostasy, as people are drawn to Christ for happiness rather than out of conviction of sin and fear of judgment. The sermon argues that only when the law is used to reveal sin and impending judgment will people cling to Christ for the right reasons, resulting in lasting faith. It also presents the nuanced idea that “law to the proud, grace to the humble” is the biblical pattern for evangelism, citing Jesus’ different approaches to the self-righteous and the contrite. The preacher further contends that the law’s strictness, extent, and spiritual nature must be understood to grasp the true nature of sin and, consequently, the true nature of the Savior and salvation. This is a distinct theological angle, focusing on the law’s preparatory and diagnostic role rather than its moral or civil uses.

Romans 3:19-20 Historical and Contextual Insights:

Reforming Grace: Embracing Forgiveness and Hope (Trinity Lutheran of Fort Pierce) provides historical context by recounting Martin Luther’s personal struggle with guilt and the medieval church’s practice of selling grace as a commodity. The sermon situates Romans 3:19-20 within the broader context of the Reformation, highlighting how Luther’s reading of the Greek text led to a paradigm shift in the understanding of justification and the role of the church as a conduit of grace rather than a gatekeeper.

Understanding Guilt: Aligning with God's Standards (Ligonier Ministries) offers a detailed historical analysis of the difference between civil law and God’s law, referencing the American and French Revolutions to illustrate shifts in cultural attitudes toward morality and guilt. The sermon also discusses the cultural revolution of the 1960s, noting how the rise of moral relativism and the separation of personal and social ethics have contributed to contemporary confusion about guilt and accountability.

Justification by Faith: Understanding God's Righteousness in Christ (Ligonier Ministries) provides historical insight into the theological debates over the meaning of “deeds of the law,” referencing the Protestant Reformation’s dispute with Roman Catholicism over the grounds of justification. The sermon also explains the Old Testament background of atonement, particularly the Day of Atonement rituals, to illuminate Paul’s language of propitiation and expiation.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) provides historical context by explaining the Jewish reliance on the law (phylacteries, public displays of piety) and how Paul, in Romans 2-3, confronts Jewish self-assurance by insisting that possession of the law only increases accountability. Begg also references the cultural context of first-century Judaism and the broader Greco-Roman world, where religious and moral distinctions were sharply drawn, and shows how Paul levels the playing field by declaring all equally guilty.

Justification by Faith Alone: The Heart of the Gospel (Ligonier Ministries) offers historical insight into the 16th-century Reformation controversy over justification, explaining the difference between the Roman Catholic and Protestant (Reformation) views, and how the debate centered on the meaning of justification—analytical versus synthetic, inherent versus imputed righteousness. The sermon also references the historical attempts at reconciliation between Roman and Reformed theologians and the centrality of the term "imputation" in those debates.

From Condemnation to Grace: Embracing God's Righteousness (Desiring God) provides contextual insight by explaining that Israel's unique privileges (the law, prophets, history) served to highlight, not diminish, their guilt, and that their failure under the law serves as a warning and lesson to the Gentile world. The preacher situates Paul's argument within the broader context of Jewish-Gentile relations and the universal scope of sin.

Understanding the Law's Role in Embracing the Gospel (Desiring God) gives historical context by referencing the Jewish possession of the "oracles of God" and how Paul's argument in Romans 3:19-20 is built on the premise that the law was first given to Israel, but its implications are universal. The sermon also references Paul's use of Old Testament quotations to support his argument.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) provides historical context by referencing the shift in evangelistic methods around the turn of the 20th century, when the church largely abandoned the use of the law as a tool to drive sinners to Christ. The sermon also references the Day of Pentecost, explaining that Peter did not need to preach sin, law, or judgment to the devout Jews present because they were already deeply familiar with the law and its demands, highlighting the cultural context of first-century Judaism where the law was central to religious life and self-understanding. The preacher also notes that Paul’s approach in Athens was different because the audience was pagan and idolatrous, so he preached against idolatry, essentially applying the first and second commandments to bring conviction of sin.

Romans 3:19-20 Cross-References in the Bible:

Reforming Grace: Embracing Forgiveness and Hope (Trinity Lutheran of Fort Pierce) references Romans 1:16-17 to connect the theme of righteousness by faith, and alludes to the Genesis creation narrative (“let there be light”) as a metaphor for God’s declarative power. The sermon also quotes from the words of institution (“hoc est corpus meum”) to draw a parallel between God’s word in the sacraments and His word of justification.

"Not So Fast, Good Person (Part 3)" (Calvary New Spring) extensively cross-references Old Testament passages cited by Paul in Romans 3:10-18, including Psalm 14:1-3, Psalm 53:1-3, Psalm 5:9, and Isaiah 59:7-8, to demonstrate the universality of sin. The sermon also references Ephesians 2:10 to discuss the purpose of good works, Galatians (as a “mini-Romans”) to explain the law as a tutor, and 1 John 1:9 to address confession and forgiveness for believers. The preacher further alludes to Genesis 15 (Abraham’s faith) and the story of David and Bathsheba to illustrate the dynamics of guilt and justification.

Understanding Guilt: Aligning with God's Standards (Ligonier Ministries) references Acts 5 (Peter’s refusal to obey civil authorities over God), the story of Stephen’s martyrdom, and Jeremiah’s description of Israel’s loss of shame (“forehead of the harlot”) to illustrate the dynamics of guilt, conscience, and cultural shifts in morality. The sermon also references the story of David and Nathan (2 Samuel 12) to show the process of conviction and restoration.

Justification by Faith: Understanding God's Righteousness in Christ (Ligonier Ministries) cross-references Genesis 15 (Abraham’s faith counted as righteousness), Psalm 32 (David’s blessing of forgiveness), and the Day of Atonement rituals in Leviticus to explain the concepts of imputation, covering, and atonement. The sermon also references Romans 4 and James’ teaching on justification to set up a future discussion on the relationship between faith and works.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) references Romans 1:16-18 to set the context for Romans 3:19-20, emphasizing the revelation of God's wrath against godlessness and wickedness. He also references Romans 3:22-23 ("all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God") and Romans 3:27 ("where then is boasting? It is excluded"), using these to reinforce the universality of sin and the exclusion of boasting. Additionally, he alludes to the Exodus narrative and the Passover as a type of Christ's atoning sacrifice, and to the story of the thief on the cross (Luke 23:39-43) as an illustration of justification by faith alone.

Justification by Faith Alone: The Heart of the Gospel (Ligonier Ministries) references Genesis 15 (Abraham believed God and it was counted to him as righteousness) as Paul's "exhibit A" for justification by faith. The sermon also references Romans 3:21-26 (the righteousness of God apart from the law), Psalm 130:3 ("If you, Lord, kept a record of sins, who could stand?"), and the broader context of Romans 1-3 to support the doctrine of imputation and justification by faith.

From Condemnation to Grace: Embracing God's Righteousness (Desiring God) cross-references 2 Corinthians 3:6 ("the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life") to explain the law's condemning function. The sermon also references Romans 1:20 (the book of nature), Romans 2:15 (the book of conscience), and Romans 3:19 (the book of Israel's history) as three "lesson books" that leave humanity without excuse. Isaiah 2:11,17 and 1 Peter 5:7 are cited to illustrate the humbling of human pride and the call to humility before God.

Understanding the Law's Role in Embracing the Gospel (Desiring God) references Romans 3:1 (the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God), Romans 7:7-8 (the law reveals and provokes sin), Romans 8:3 (the law's weakness through the flesh), and Romans 5:20 (the law increases trespass). The sermon also alludes to the Ten Commandments and the broader narrative of Israel's failure under the law.

Interpreting Scripture: Heart, Law, and Truth (Desiring God) references 1 Timothy 1:8-11 (the law is good if used lawfully), Matthew 5 (Jesus' deepening of the law's demands), Hosea 6:6 ("I desire mercy, not sacrifice"), and the book of Hebrews (the limits and right use of the law). The sermon also references Matthew 16:1-3 (interpreting the signs of the times) to illustrate the importance of proper interpretation.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) references several passages to support and expand on Romans 3:19-20. Psalm 19:7 is cited to show that “the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul,” reinforcing the law’s role in bringing about repentance. Romans 7:7 is used to illustrate that Paul himself did not know sin except through the law. Galatians 3:24 is quoted to describe the law as a “schoolmaster” leading to Christ. The sermon also references James (convinced of the law as a transgressor), Luke 10:25 (the lawyer and the commandments), and the story of the rich young ruler to show Jesus’ use of the law to bring conviction. Matthew 5:19 is cited to emphasize the importance of teaching the law, and the Day of Pentecost narrative is used to show how the law prepared the Jewish audience for the gospel. The preacher also references Paul’s sermon in Athens (Acts 17) to illustrate the contextual use of the law in evangelism.

Romans 3:19-20 Christian References outside the Bible:

Reforming Grace: Embracing Forgiveness and Hope (Trinity Lutheran of Fort Pierce) explicitly references Martin Luther, quoting his famous advice to “tell the devil” that Christ has made satisfaction for our sins. The sermon also discusses Luther’s personal journey and theological breakthrough regarding justification by faith, highlighting his influence on the Reformation and the Lutheran tradition’s understanding of grace.

Justification by Faith: Understanding God's Righteousness in Christ (Ligonier Ministries) references the broader Protestant tradition and the Reformed slogans “sola fide” and “sola gratia,” situating the interpretation of Romans 3:19-20 within the historical debates between Protestantism and Roman Catholicism over the nature of justification and the role of works.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) explicitly references F.F. Bruce, quoting him as saying, "God pronounces a man righteous at the beginning of his course, not at the end of it," to illustrate the doctrine of justification as a legal declaration rather than a process. Begg also references Augustus Toplady's hymn "Rock of Ages" to encapsulate the idea of coming to Christ with nothing but need.

Justification by Faith Alone: The Heart of the Gospel (Ligonier Ministries) explicitly references Martin Luther, explaining his "tower experience," his use of the terms justitia alienum ("alien righteousness") and simul justus et peccator, and his insistence on the centrality of imputation in justification. The sermon also references the historical debates between Roman Catholic and Reformation theologians, particularly the Diet of Worms and subsequent attempts at reconciliation.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) explicitly references a wide range of Christian authors and preachers in its discussion of Romans 3:19-20. Charles Spurgeon is quoted as saying, “They will never accept Grace until they tremble for a just and holy law.” D.L. Moody is cited: “The law can only chase a man to Calvary, no further,” and “This is what God gives us the law for, to show us ourselves and our true colors.” John Wycliffe is quoted: “The highest service to which a man may attain on earth is to preach the law of God.” Martin Luther is referenced: “The first duty of the Gospel preacher is to declare God’s law and show the nature of sin.” John Wesley is cited as suggesting that preachers should use “90% law and 10% grace.” Matthew Henry, John Bunyan, John Newton, and Charles Finney are also quoted, all affirming the necessity of the law in bringing conviction of sin and preparing the way for the gospel. The sermon also references the evangelist Abe Earl, who claimed that “the severest threatenings of the law of God have a prominent place in Leading Men to Christ; they must see themselves lost before they will cry for Mercy.”

Romans 3:19-20 Illustrations from Secular Sources:

"Not So Fast, Good Person (Part 3)" (Calvary New Spring) uses the detailed analogy of a “barcode” on a car window to illustrate the false sense of privilege or access that religious people (like the Jews in Paul’s argument) might feel. The preacher describes how having a barcode allows him to bypass security and enter a gated community without question, while others must wait and justify their presence. This metaphor is used to show how people rely on inherited or external markers of righteousness, only to find that such credentials are meaningless before God’s law. The sermon also references the experience of working as a line cook and intentionally making waitresses cry as a metaphor for the destructive power of words, connecting it to Paul’s description of sinful speech in Romans 3.

Understanding Guilt: Aligning with God's Standards (Ligonier Ministries) draws on the cultural history of the 1960s, referencing the slogans “do your own thing” and “tell it like it is” to illustrate the rise of moral relativism and the disjunction between personal and social ethics. The preacher also recounts a counseling session with a college student struggling with guilt over premarital sex, using it as a case study in the difference between objective guilt and subjective guilt feelings, and critiquing the influence of “Jiminy Cricket theology” (from Disney’s Pinocchio) on contemporary understandings of conscience.

Recognizing Our Need for a Savior Through the Law (Alistair Begg, Truth for Life) uses the secular analogy of school grades to illustrate justification: everyone receives an "F" except Jesus, who receives an "A," and the gospel is the offer to exchange our "F" for his "A." Begg also uses the metaphor of a "black velvet" jewelry display to describe how the law sets the backdrop for the brilliance of the gospel, and references the experience of boarding an airplane and evaluating one's worthiness based on recent good or bad deeds to illustrate the misunderstanding of justification.

Understanding the Law's Role in Embracing the Gospel (Desiring God) uses the analogy of a teenage boy finding a postcard labeled "for parents only" to illustrate how the law provokes desire and exposes sin that was previously dormant, showing that the law not only defines sin but stirs it up in the human heart.

The Law's Role in Leading Us to Christ (SermonIndex.net) uses several detailed secular analogies to illustrate Romans 3:19-20. The first is the speeding ticket analogy: the preacher imagines telling someone that a $25,000 speeding fine has been paid for them, which makes no sense unless they first understand they have broken the law. This is used to show that the gospel is meaningless without first understanding one’s guilt under the law. The most elaborate illustration is the parachute analogy: two men are given parachutes on a plane, one told it will improve his flight, the other told he will have to jump. The first is disillusioned and discards the parachute when it brings discomfort and ridicule, while the second clings to it because he knows it is his only hope of survival. This is used to argue that people must be made aware of the coming judgment (the “jump”) before they will truly value Christ (the “parachute”). The preacher also uses the story of a sheep appearing white against green grass but dirty against snow to illustrate how people see themselves as good compared to others, but sinful when measured against God’s law. Another analogy involves a drowning man who resists rescue until he realizes he is in danger, illustrating that people will not seek salvation until they are convinced of their peril under the law.