Understanding Limited Atonement: God's Purpose in Salvation

Devotional

Sermon Summary

Sermon Clips


SPROUL: As we continue now with our study of the core doctrines of Reformed theology, and we've been looking at the controversial five points of Calvinism, and we've already looked at the T in TULIP and the U in TULIP. And all that's left of the TULIP now is the LIP part, and we're going to start today by looking at the L of TULIP which stands for limited atonement. [00:00:13]

It does not mean that there's a limit to be placed upon the value or the merit of the atonement of Jesus Christ. It's traditional to say that the atoning work of Christ is sufficient for all. That is that it's meritorious value is sufficient to cover the sins of all people, and certainly anyone who puts their trust in Jesus Christ will receive the full measure of the benefits of that atonement. [00:01:34]

Now one of the traditional, again, ways of talking about this is to say that the atonement is sufficient for all but efficient for some. That is not everyone actually receives the full benefits that are wrought by Christ's saving work on the cross; namely, those who do not believe. But so far all of those distinctions do is distinguish our theology from universalism. [00:03:11]

What this doctrine is concerned about chiefly is this: What was the original purpose, plan, or design of God in sending Christ into the world to die on the cross? Was it the Father's intent to send His Son to die on the cross to make salvation possible for everybody, but also with the possibility that it would be effective for nobody? [00:03:57]

That's why we prefer not to use the term limited atonement because it is so misleading and rather to speak of definite redemption or definite atonement meaning that God the Father designed the work of redemption specifically with a view to providing salvation for the elect, and that Christ, though His death is valuable enough to meet the needs of everybody, that there was a special and unique sense in which He died for His sheep. [00:05:08]

Now the problem that emerges from this technical point of theology in terms of God's eternal decrees and His ultimate design and purpose for the atonement is often discussed in light of several passages in the New Testament. For example when it says that Jesus died for the sins of all the world and so on, which incidentally these difficult questions, I think, have been masterfully treated in what I think is the best treatment of this doctrine ever written, and that by the Puritan theologian John Owen in his book, "The Death of Death." [00:06:10]

The first is the word "willing" and the second is the word "any." Now let's look at the first one. God is not willing that any should perish. Here is a specific reference to the will of God. And we know that in the New Testament there are two Greek words both of which can be translated in English by the word will. Unfortunately, each of these words is capable of several different nuances. [00:10:04]

The first way the bible speaks of the will of God is in terms of what we call the decretive will of God, or some people call it the sovereign efficacious will of God; others call it the ultimate will of God. And what we mean by this meaning for will or willingness has to do with that will of God by which God brings to pass sovereignly whatsoever He chooses to do. [00:11:09]

The third way in which the term willing is used Biblically with respect to God is what we call His will of disposition. And here this is one of those anthropomorphic expressions that talk about the emotions of God, what pleases God, what causes God to be delighted, and what causes God to grieve and that sort of thing. [00:15:22]

I think, frankly that what Peter's talking about here is that group that is mentioned frequently in his epistle by the designation elect. Certainly the Bible speaks frequently of the elect, and the elect make up a distinctive group, and the question is is Peter here speaking about people? Is he speaking of the body of disciples of which Peter is a member? [00:18:04]

And so I don't think that this text gets rid of the idea that God designed the atonement for a purpose which purpose by His design must needs come to pass. I don't think we want to believe in a God who is a spectator of the drama of redemption who sends a Christ to die on the cross and then stands there holding, crossing His finger hoping that someone will take advantage of it. [00:21:23]

Our view is that the plan of redemption was an eternal plan of God, and which plan and which design was perfectly conceived and perfectly executed so that the will of God to save His people, in fact, is accomplished by the atoning work of Christ. [00:22:00]

Ask a question about this sermon