Understanding Christ's Dual Nature and the Trinity

 

Summary

In our exploration of the Trinity, we delve into the historical developments that have shaped the church's understanding of Christ's nature. The early centuries of Christianity were marked by significant theological debates, particularly concerning the nature of Christ and the Trinity. The Council of Nicea in 325 was a pivotal moment, addressing the Arian controversy and affirming the full deity of Christ. However, this was not the end of the church's struggles. The subsequent centuries saw further challenges, notably the monophysite heresy of Eutyches and the nestorian heresy, both of which threatened to distort the church's understanding of Christ's dual nature.

Eutyches proposed that Christ had a single, theanthropic nature, blending the divine and human into one. This view was countered by the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which affirmed that Christ is one person with two distinct natures, divine and human, without confusion or separation. The council's declaration, "vera Deus, vera homo" (truly God, truly man), set the boundaries for Christological reflection, emphasizing that each nature retains its own attributes.

The distinction between distinguishing and separating the natures of Christ is crucial. While the divine and human natures are distinct, they are not separate. This understanding is vital when considering the actions and experiences of Christ, such as His suffering and death, which pertain to His human nature, while His divine nature remains unchanged.

The Council of Chalcedon also addressed the kenotic heresy, which suggested that Christ relinquished some divine attributes in the incarnation. This was firmly rejected, affirming that both natures retain their full attributes. The council's teachings remain a cornerstone for orthodox Christology, guiding the church in maintaining a balanced understanding of Christ's nature.

Key Takeaways:

1. Historical Context and the Trinity: The early church faced significant theological challenges, particularly concerning the nature of Christ and the Trinity. The Council of Nicea was a watershed moment, affirming the full deity of Christ and setting a precedent for future theological clarity. Understanding these historical developments helps us appreciate the depth and complexity of the doctrine of the Trinity. [01:08]

2. The Monophysite Heresy: Eutyches' monophysite heresy proposed a single, blended nature for Christ, which the church rejected. The Council of Chalcedon affirmed that Christ is one person with two distinct natures, divine and human, without confusion or separation. This distinction is crucial for maintaining a balanced understanding of Christ's nature. [04:59]

3. Distinction vs. Separation: Theological precision requires distinguishing between Christ's divine and human natures without separating them. This understanding is vital when considering Christ's actions and experiences, such as His suffering and death, which pertain to His human nature, while His divine nature remains unchanged. [10:47]

4. Chalcedon's Four Negatives: The Council of Chalcedon set boundaries for Christological reflection, emphasizing that Christ's natures are united without mixture, confusion, division, or separation. This framework helps prevent theological errors and maintains the integrity of Christ's dual nature. [17:20]

5. Kenotic Heresy and Divine Attributes: The kenotic heresy suggested that Christ relinquished some divine attributes in the incarnation, which Chalcedon firmly rejected. Both natures retain their full attributes, ensuring that Christ is truly God and truly man. This understanding is essential for maintaining orthodox Christology. [23:15]

Youtube Chapters:

- [00:00] - Welcome
- [00:25] - Early Church Challenges
- [01:08] - Importance of Revisiting the Trinity
- [01:51] - Historical Heresies and Their Impact
- [02:44] - The Role of Heresy in Defining Orthodoxy
- [03:16] - Eutyches and Monophysitism
- [04:04] - Understanding Monophysite Heresy
- [04:59] - Christ's Dual Nature
- [05:48] - Theanthropic Nature Explained
- [08:10] - Chalcedon's Response to Heresies
- [09:03] - Nestorianism and Its Implications
- [10:47] - Distinction vs. Separation
- [13:00] - The Cross and Christ's Natures
- [14:28] - Chalcedon's Lasting Impact
- [17:20] - Chalcedon's Four Negatives
- [23:15] - Kenotic Heresy and Divine Attributes

Study Guide

Bible Study Discussion Guide: Understanding the Trinity and Christ's Nature

Bible Reading:
1. John 1:14 - "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth."
2. Colossians 2:9 - "For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form."
3. Hebrews 1:3 - "The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word."

---

Observation Questions:

1. What was the significance of the Council of Nicea in 325, and how did it address the Arian controversy? [01:08]

2. How did the Council of Chalcedon in 451 respond to Eutyches' monophysite heresy, and what was its declaration regarding Christ's nature? [09:03]

3. What are the "Four Negatives" established by the Council of Chalcedon, and why are they important for Christological reflection? [17:20]

4. How does the sermon describe the difference between distinguishing and separating Christ's divine and human natures? [10:47]

---

Interpretation Questions:

1. How does the historical context of the early church's theological debates help us understand the complexity of the doctrine of the Trinity today? [01:51]

2. In what ways does the distinction between Christ's divine and human natures impact our understanding of His actions and experiences, such as His suffering and death? [13:00]

3. How does the rejection of the kenotic heresy by the Council of Chalcedon affirm the full attributes of both Christ's divine and human natures? [23:15]

4. What are the implications of the monophysite and nestorian heresies for our understanding of Christ's dual nature, and how do they challenge orthodox Christology? [19:54]

---

Application Questions:

1. Reflect on a time when you encountered a theological debate or misunderstanding. How did it affect your faith, and what steps did you take to seek clarity? [03:16]

2. How can understanding the historical heresies and councils help you engage in more informed discussions about Christ's nature with others? [02:44]

3. In what ways can you apply the principle of distinguishing without separating in your own life, particularly in balancing different aspects of your identity or roles? [10:47]

4. How does the affirmation of Christ as "truly God, truly man" influence your personal relationship with Him, especially in times of doubt or struggle? [15:09]

5. Consider the "Four Negatives" from Chalcedon. How can these principles guide you in maintaining a balanced understanding of complex theological concepts in your faith journey? [17:20]

6. How might the rejection of the kenotic heresy shape your view of Christ's divinity and humanity, and how does this understanding impact your worship and devotion? [23:15]

7. Identify a specific area in your life where you might be tempted to "overcorrect" in your beliefs or actions. How can you seek a balanced approach that aligns with orthodox teachings? [02:44]

Devotional

Day 1: The Trinity's Historical Journey
The early church faced significant theological challenges, particularly concerning the nature of Christ and the Trinity. The Council of Nicea in 325 was a watershed moment, affirming the full deity of Christ and setting a precedent for future theological clarity. This council addressed the Arian controversy, which questioned the divinity of Christ, and established a foundational understanding that Christ is of the same substance as the Father. Understanding these historical developments helps us appreciate the depth and complexity of the doctrine of the Trinity, as it was through these debates and councils that the church clarified its beliefs and teachings. [01:08]

Isaiah 43:10-11 (ESV): "You are my witnesses," declares the Lord, "and my servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me. I, I am the Lord, and besides me there is no savior."

Reflection: How does understanding the historical journey of the Trinity deepen your appreciation for the complexity and depth of your faith today?


Day 2: Christ's Dual Nature Affirmed
Eutyches' monophysite heresy proposed a single, blended nature for Christ, which the church rejected. The Council of Chalcedon in 451 affirmed that Christ is one person with two distinct natures, divine and human, without confusion or separation. This distinction is crucial for maintaining a balanced understanding of Christ's nature. The council's declaration, "vera Deus, vera homo" (truly God, truly man), set the boundaries for Christological reflection, emphasizing that each nature retains its own attributes. This understanding helps prevent theological errors and maintains the integrity of Christ's dual nature. [04:59]

Colossians 2:9 (ESV): "For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily."

Reflection: In what ways does the affirmation of Christ's dual nature impact your understanding of His role in your life today?


Day 3: Distinction Without Separation
Theological precision requires distinguishing between Christ's divine and human natures without separating them. This understanding is vital when considering Christ's actions and experiences, such as His suffering and death, which pertain to His human nature, while His divine nature remains unchanged. The distinction between distinguishing and separating the natures of Christ is crucial, as it allows believers to comprehend how Christ could fully experience human life while remaining fully divine. This balance is essential for a coherent and orthodox Christology. [10:47]

Hebrews 4:15 (ESV): "For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin."

Reflection: How does the understanding of Christ's distinct yet united natures help you relate to Him in your daily struggles and triumphs?


Day 4: Chalcedon's Four Negatives
The Council of Chalcedon set boundaries for Christological reflection, emphasizing that Christ's natures are united without mixture, confusion, division, or separation. This framework helps prevent theological errors and maintains the integrity of Christ's dual nature. By establishing these four negatives, the council provided a clear guideline for understanding how Christ's divine and human natures coexist. This understanding is crucial for maintaining a balanced and orthodox view of Christ's identity and work. [17:20]

1 Timothy 3:16 (ESV): "Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory."

Reflection: How can the framework of Chalcedon's four negatives guide you in your personal study and understanding of Christ's nature?


Day 5: The Kenotic Heresy Rejected
The kenotic heresy suggested that Christ relinquished some divine attributes in the incarnation, which Chalcedon firmly rejected. Both natures retain their full attributes, ensuring that Christ is truly God and truly man. This understanding is essential for maintaining orthodox Christology, as it affirms that Christ's divinity was not diminished in His incarnation. The rejection of the kenotic heresy upholds the belief that Christ's divine nature remained fully intact, even as He took on human form. [23:15]

Philippians 2:6-7 (ESV): "Who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men."

Reflection: In what ways does the affirmation of Christ's full divine and human attributes challenge or encourage you in your faith journey today?

Quotes

"As we continue now with our study of the Trinity we're looking at a historical overview of those crucial developments in church history where the doctrine of Trinity was at stake. And as I've mention for the first three hundred years of Christian history, the focal point was on John's concept of the Logos, or the Word, who becomes flesh and who dwells among us; and we saw the crisis that was provoked in the Third Century by the modalism of Sabellius who was condemned at Antioch in 267 and then the ever greater crisis of the denial of the full deity of Christ by Arius in the early years of the Fourth Century that culminated in the Council of Nicea and the writing of the Nicene Creed in 325." [00:01:53]

"Now it's been said that historically there have been four centuries where the church's understanding of the natures of Christ, the person of Christ, have been most critical. And those four centuries in church history have been the Fourth Century, which we've already viewed, the Fifth Century, which we're about to look at, and then the Nineteenth Century and the Twentieth Century. And I mention that because we are living now in the aftermath of two hundred years of devastating attacks against the church's orthodox understanding of the person of Christ. That's why it's so important in our day that we revisit this whole concept of the Trinity." [00:01:23]

"I remember having a specific course when I was doing my doctoral studies in Holland, where Professor Berkouwer gave a whole year's lectures on the history of heresy. It was an extremely valuable course, because one of the best ways of learning orthodoxy is learning what it isn't. In fact the function that heresy has in church history is that it forces the church to be precise. It forces the church to define her doctrines and to differentiate her truths from the attending falsehoods and corruptions of that truth." [00:02:58]

"Now, remember the formula that the church has used through the ages to define the Trinity: that God is one in essence or being, or nature, and three in person. Now just the opposite is used with respect to the church's confession of the person of Christ. The person of Christ is confessed to be one person, but with two natures -- a human nature and a divine nature. And now in this problem with Eutyches and the monophysite heresy, is the monophysite heresy taught that Jesus did not have two natures -- one divine nature and a human nature -- but He only had one nature." [00:04:52]

"Now his understanding of that single nature of Christ may be described as viewing Jesus as having a single theanthropic nature. Now that word theanthropic is not very common in our normal speech is it? Philanthropic maybe. When we say that there are philanthropic organizations or philanthropic people, what do we mean? The word 'anthropic' comes from the Greek anthropos, which means 'man or mankind.' We study anthropology in the university, which is the study of people, human beings." [00:05:51]

"Now I like to teach my seminary students distinctions because theology is about making distinctions. It's the prerogative of the theologian to make fine distinctions; it's been going on for centuries. And I tell them, 'One of the most important distinctions you will ever learn to make is the distinction between a distinction and a separation.' We say of you that you are a duality (that is a unity in duality) -- that as a human being you are made up of a physical dimension and of a non-physical dimension, which language the Bible describes in terms of body and soul." [00:10:21]

"Now the second thing for which Chalcedon is known, and perhaps the most famous thing for which it is known, are the so-called 'Four Negatives' -- the Four Negatives of the council. When the council confessed that there is a perfect unity between two natures in Christ -- the divine nature and the human nature -- that they are to be understood in this union between the divine and the human as being in united -- united in such a way as to be without mixture, confusion, division, or separation -- that is, what the church set the boundaries of Christology in the Fifth Century by saying, However we understand the mystery of the carnation and the person of Christ, and the relationship between the divine nature and the human nature, is you cannot conceive of the human and divine nature as being confused or mixed together, where you end up with a deified human nature or a humanized divine nature." [00:17:11]

"Now at the same time as the monophysite heresy is rejected by the first two negatives, the next two negatives have Nestorius in their sites -- that they're trying to reject the heresy of nestorianism by saying that the two natures are perfectly united. You can distinguish between them, but you can't divide them; you can't separate them. And so you have to walk that razor's edge between confusion and separation if you're going to have a sound understanding of the person of Christ." [00:19:22]

"Now let me just give you the third element of this council that's so important, and that is after the Four Negatives (I believe there's a semicolon -- it may be a semicolon; it may be a colon), the final clause of this says, 'Each nature retaining it's own attributes' -- that is, in the incarnation God doesn't give up any of His attributes, and nor does humanity give up any of its attributes in the incarnation. That's why we say the human body of Jesus -- the human nature of Jesus is still subject to geographic limits." [00:22:37]

"One of the great heresies in the Nineteenth Century was the so-called kenotic heresy that said that in the incarnation deity gave up some of its attributes to be united to this human nature, which is a violation of Chalcedon. By the way, and I have to say this: Just this week I got the second letter from somebody that read my book Renewing Your Mind, which is now out in its third title and third edition, the last edition of which was reworked, brought up to date by an editor at the publishing house, and after they did it, they sent it to me; and after they made their changes and asked me to give the final corrections and proofs, which I did hastily, and I missed something that somebody who read it wrote to me and said, 'Did you -- I can't believe that you teach the kenotic heresy because in -- on one of the pages in that book, it has me saying that in the incarnation Jesus laid aside His divine nature.'" [00:23:25]

"But I just got a letter from somebody else the other day who read that same thing from that edition, and I mean, that's how mistakes are made like that. It's terrible. But I mean even in our day we have these people running around glibly saying that in the incarnation God no longer retains His divine attributes. Chalcedon -- 'truly God, truly man, without confusion, mixture, separation, division -- or division, separation, each nature retaining its own attributes.'" [00:24:52]

Chatbot

  • I'm an AI bot trained specifically on the sermon from Aug 26, 2019. Do you have any questions about it?

Transcript
What was the most surprising thing in this sermon?
Were there any personal stories shared?