The Mystery of Christ's Presence in the Lord's Supper

Devotional

Sermon Summary

Sermon Clips


The majority report in church history favors the real presence of Christ in the celebration of the Lord's Supper so that when we gather at the table we are in a real communion with him, and of course not everybody believes that there's any special way in which he's present at the Lord's Supper. [00:00:52]

The question that has emerged in the controversies historically focuses on this word is. How is it to be understood? There are real controversies where the outcome of the debate rests upon what the meaning of is is because in the English language, the word is is indeed a part of the verb to be. [00:02:03]

In addition to this use of the verb to be, there is also the metaphorical use where the verb to be or the word is in this case may mean represents. And so you think, for example, of the I am statements of Jesus that are found in the Gospel of John where Jesus says I am the vine, you are the branches. [00:04:01]

The obvious question is how is is being used here? What is the meaning of is in this context? Is Jesus saying this bread that I am breaking now really is my flesh, this cup of wine that I've blessed this really is my blood so that when people were drinking that wine they were actually drinking his blood? [00:05:39]

The Roman Catholic Church then and now, and then it taught continues to teach the doctrine of transubstantiation. This is the view that the substance of the bread and wine are transferred supernaturally or transformed, I should say, supernaturally into the actual body and blood of Jesus. [00:08:16]

The church came up with a formula, really not just a theological formula, but a philosophical formula to account for the phenomenon of the appearances of bread and wine remaining. They reached back into the past to the philosophical categories of Aristotle and borrowed language from Aristotle to articulate their view. [00:10:16]

Aristotle was very much concerned with the nature of reality, and he made a distinction of objects in real objects between what he called their substance or their essence, the real stuff of what makes a thing what it is, its real essence, and what he called the accidents, which were not accidents that you know. [00:10:54]

In the miracle of the mass, a double miracle takes place. On the one hand, the substance of the bread and wine changes into the substance of the body and blood of Christ, while the accidents remain the same. Now what does that mean? That means prior to the miracle, you have the substance of bread and the accidents of bread. [00:13:28]

Luther objected to transubstantiation because he believed that it involved a frivolous miracle, unnecessary. He said you don't have to go through all of this substance and accidents distinction when we can still have a view of the real corporeal presence of Christ in the Last Supper. [00:18:28]

Calvin had to debate against those people because he was insisting on the real presence of Christ and on the other hand he was debating with the Roman Catholics and with the Lutherans with respect to the nature of that presence and one of the oddities there is Calvin's use of the word substance or substantive. [00:21:45]

Against the spiritualist Calvin argue for the substantial presence of Christ meaning the real presence of Christ and with the Catholics and the Lutherans he denied the substantial presence of Christ because he's denying the physical presence of Christ. [00:23:16]

The Lord's Supper calls us to unity amidst diversity. Despite historical disagreements, it remains a central act of worship that unites believers in remembrance and anticipation of Christ's return. This unity in diversity reflects the broader call to love and fellowship in the body of Christ. [00:21:45]

Ask a question about this sermon