Navigating Church-State Relations and the Legislation of Sin
Devotional
Day 1: The Church's Role in Society's Moral Compass
The relationship between the church and state is intricate, especially when considering the legislation of sin. The church is not a geopolitical entity and should not enforce laws with the sword, but rather guide through spiritual means. The church's role is to provide moral guidance and spiritual discipline, leaving ultimate judgment to Christ. This understanding helps maintain the integrity of both the church and the state, ensuring that the church remains a beacon of spiritual truth rather than a political force. [06:54]
"For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit." (Romans 14:17, ESV)
Reflection: How can you contribute to your community's moral compass without resorting to judgment or force?
Day 2: Biblical Wisdom on Alcohol and Society
The Bible warns against drunkenness but does not mandate total abstinence. Imposing such laws without biblical backing can lead to unintended consequences, as seen with the prohibition era. The intention behind prohibition was to create a better society free from the harms of drunkenness, but the approach was flawed. Christians are called to exercise wisdom and discernment, understanding that societal change requires more than just legal mandates; it requires a transformation of the heart. [04:06]
"Do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit." (Ephesians 5:18, ESV)
Reflection: In what ways can you model responsible behavior and influence others positively regarding alcohol consumption?
Day 3: Spiritual Discipline Over State Enforcement
The church's role is to guide and discipline through spiritual means, leaving ultimate judgment to Christ. The use of state power to enforce religious obedience often leads to corruption and a misunderstanding of true faith. Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, and thus, the use of force to compel obedience to Christ is not sanctioned. The church must focus on spiritual growth and transformation, trusting that God will work in the hearts of individuals. [08:06]
"For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds." (2 Corinthians 10:4, ESV)
Reflection: How can you practice spiritual discipline in your own life and encourage others to do the same without resorting to coercion?
Day 4: The Nature of Jesus' Kingdom
Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, and thus, the use of force to compel obedience to Christ is not sanctioned. The state should not punish individuals for disobeying Christ, as this is the church's domain through spiritual discipline, not physical punishment. Christians are called to live out the values of Jesus' kingdom, which are characterized by love, grace, and truth, rather than force or coercion. [09:10]
"My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world." (John 18:36, ESV)
Reflection: How can you embody the values of Jesus' kingdom in your daily interactions and decisions?
Day 5: Consulting Christ in Legislation
Christians should consult Christ's teachings when considering what sins should be prohibited by law. It is crucial to distinguish between enforcing laws that align with Christ's teachings and compelling obedience to Christ through state power. This nuanced understanding helps maintain the integrity of both the church and the state, ensuring that laws reflect Christ's love and justice rather than mere legalism. [11:55]
"Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God." (Romans 13:1, ESV)
Reflection: How can you advocate for laws that reflect Christ's teachings while respecting the separation of church and state?
Sermon Summary
In today's discussion, we delved into the complex relationship between the church, state, and the legislation of sin. The question posed was whether, as a pastor in 1913, I would have supported the prohibition of alcohol. This question opens up broader issues about the role of government in outlawing sin and how Christians should navigate these waters. Reflecting on the past, it's clear that while the intention behind prohibition was to create a better society free from the harms of drunkenness, the approach was flawed. The Bible does not mandate total abstinence from alcohol, but rather warns against drunkenness. Therefore, imposing such a law would not align with biblical teachings.
Furthermore, the prohibition had unintended consequences, highlighting the importance of societal support for such measures. The church today is not a geopolitical entity like Israel in the Old Testament, and thus, it does not have the authority to enforce laws with the sword. Instead, the church's role is to guide and discipline through spiritual means, leaving ultimate judgment to Christ.
The history of using state power to enforce religious obedience has often led to corruption and a misunderstanding of true faith. Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, and thus, the use of force to compel obedience to Christ is not sanctioned. The state should not punish individuals for disobeying Christ, as this is the church's domain through spiritual discipline, not physical punishment.
In conclusion, while Christians should consult Christ's teachings when considering what sins should be prohibited by law, it is crucial to distinguish between enforcing laws that align with Christ's teachings and compelling obedience to Christ through state power. This nuanced understanding helps maintain the integrity of both the church and the state.
Key Takeaways
1. State Relations:** The relationship between the church and state is intricate, especially when considering the legislation of sin. The church is not a geopolitical entity and should not enforce laws with the sword, but rather guide through spiritual means. [06:54] 2. Prohibition and Biblical Teachings: The Bible warns against drunkenness but does not mandate total abstinence. Imposing such laws without biblical backing can lead to unintended consequences, as seen with the prohibition era.
3. The Role of the Church in Discipline: The church's role is to guide and discipline through spiritual means, leaving ultimate judgment to Christ. The use of state power to enforce religious obedience often leads to corruption.
4. Jesus' Kingdom and State Power: Jesus' kingdom is not of this world, and thus, the use of force to compel obedience to Christ is not sanctioned. The state should not punish individuals for disobeying Christ, as this is the church's domain.
5. Consulting Christ in Legislation: Christians should consult Christ's teachings when considering what sins should be prohibited by law. It is crucial to distinguish between enforcing laws that align with Christ's teachings and compelling obedience to Christ through state power.
Proverbs 23:32-34 - "In the end it bites like a serpent and stings like an adder; your eyes will see strange things, and your heart utter perverse things. You will be like one who lies down in the midst of the sea, like one who lies on the top of a mast."
John 18:36 - "Jesus answered, 'My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.'"
Romans 13:4 - "For the one in authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer."
Observation Questions:
What does Proverbs 23:32-34 warn about the effects of alcohol, and how does this relate to the sermon’s discussion on prohibition? [04:21]
How does John 18:36 help us understand Jesus' perspective on the use of force in his kingdom? [09:10]
According to Romans 13:4, what role does the state have in enforcing laws, and how does this relate to the sermon’s view on the church's role in discipline? [09:22]
Interpretation Questions:
How does the sermon interpret the relationship between the church and state in terms of enforcing religious obedience? [08:22]
In what ways does the sermon suggest that the prohibition era failed to align with biblical teachings on alcohol? [04:06]
How does the sermon distinguish between the church's spiritual discipline and the state's use of force? [10:53]
Application Questions:
Reflect on a time when you felt the church or state overstepped in enforcing moral behavior. How did you respond, and what might you do differently now? [06:09]
How can you personally balance the biblical warning against drunkenness with the freedom to consume alcohol responsibly? [04:06]
In what ways can you contribute to your church’s role in guiding and disciplining through spiritual means rather than relying on state enforcement? [08:06]
How can you apply Jesus' teaching that his kingdom is not of this world in your daily interactions with secular authorities? [09:10]
Consider a law or societal norm that aligns with Christ’s teachings. How do you support or challenge it in your community? [11:55]
How can you ensure that your actions and beliefs reflect a clear distinction between obeying Christ and obeying laws that Christ approves? [10:21]
Identify a situation where you might have confused state authority with spiritual authority. How can you clarify this distinction in your life moving forward? [10:53]
Sermon Clips
The church today, the people of Christ on this side of the cross, unlike Israel in the Old Testament, are not a geopolitical entity. The church is not a nation state; therefore, the Old Testament legal stipulations with their punishments like capital punishment for idolatry or cursing one's parents are not simply brought over and implemented in the church. [00:06:56]
The church excommunicates unrepentant idolaters; it doesn't execute them. This does not mean that those sins are less grievous or less worthy of capital punishment. It means that the church hands over that judgment to Christ at his coming. There will be a perfect reckoning from the judge of the universe. Christ will settle all accounts. [00:07:26]
Christian faith and all the heart obedience of faith, which flows from it, cannot be coerced by the sword, that is, by the state. The entire history of Christendom by force, from Constantine to the Puritans, was misguided. Any arrangement of church-state relations that sanctions state penalties to promote true heart faith and the heart obedience of faith will eventually corrupt the church. [00:08:07]
Jesus said in John 18:36, "My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not of this world." Now the inference I draw from that statement and other aspects of the New Testament is that Christ, in this age, does not sanction the use of the sword to punish those who disobey him. [00:08:48]
Christ does not sanction the use of the sword to enforce disobedience to him. This means that the state, to whom God has given the sword according to Romans 13, should not seek to compel obedience to Christ. Now listen carefully because I'm going to make some distinctions here that are fine. I'll leave a lot of questions unanswered, but I think these distinctions really help. [00:09:28]
Obeying a law that Christ would approve is not the same as obeying Christ, and disobeying a law that Christ would approve is not the same as disobeying Christ. A person who doesn't even believe that Christ existed can obey a law that Christ approves. Therefore, punishment for disobeying a law that Christ approves is not the same as punishment for disobeying Christ. [00:10:06]
I don't think the state should ever punish a person for disobeying Christ. I think that is the prerogative of church discipline, and I think the most severe form of church discipline is excommunication, not death. There is a difference between saying that Christ wills that a person be punished by the state for breaking a law Christ approves and saying that Christ wills that a person be punished by the state for disobeying him. [00:10:46]
The former is right; the latter's wrong. Christ does will that a person be punished by the state for breaking a law that he approves, but Christ does not will that a person be punished by the state for disobeying Christ. All of which implies that Christians should consult Christ in his word when thinking through what sins should be prohibited by law. [00:11:29]
Because the use of the sword to enforce Christ-approved laws is not the same as using the sword to enforce obedience to Christ. That is complex; they'll have to hit replay, rewind, and replay. Even better, read the full transcript of the episode, I guess. This is as good of an opportunity as any to remind everyone out there that, as you listen to this episode, this podcast is transcribed in its entirety. [00:12:03]
First, because the Bible does not require teetotalism. It prohibits drunkenness; it warns about the dangers of alcohol. In the end, it bites like a serpent and stings like an adder. Your eyes will see strange things, and your heart utter perverse things. You will be like one who lies down in the midst of the sea, like one who lies on the top of a mast. [00:04:08]
I think a very strong case can be made for total abstinence in our world as a matter of wisdom for oneself, but not as a requirement for others, except maybe in some limited institutional expectations. This is mainly a matter of conscience. But second reason I would not get in my time machine and go back and vote for prohibition is that it didn't work. [00:04:45]
It had unintended consequences that may have been as destructive as the previous abuse of alcohol itself, and this is because, unlike the limitations on smoking in our day, the long-term societal support was simply not there. It seemed like it was there because, good night, it takes a lot of people to get an amendment to the constitution passed in 1919, but by 1933, the adequate support had disintegrated, and it was reversed. [00:05:08]