Exploring Eschatology: Credibility of Scripture and Jesus

Devotional

Sermon Summary

Sermon Clips


Now, when we enter the arena of eschatology we enter a fascinating subject, but one in which there's very little consensus among Christians. There's probably more disagreement about matters relating to eschatology among Christian people than among all of the other doctrines that tend to divide us put together. [00:00:42]

And because of that there has been something of a crisis in our time in terms of trying to understand the teaching of Scripture with respect to future prophecy. Now, I need to alert you at the beginning that as I canvass some of these issues of eschatology in this series I'm going to be taking a position on eschatology that is a minority report. [00:01:09]

And in fact it'll be a viewpoint on eschatology that many, if not most of you, who are hearing this will be hearing for the first time perhaps. And it may even come as a shock to you to hear some of the positions that I take because my own thinking on eschatological matters has undergone a transition from earlier times. [00:01:43]

And secondly it has to do even more importantly with the credibility of Jesus Himself. And that's why I'm concerned to look at what Jesus taught about the last things. I won't be covering many of the common issues of eschatology, interpretations for example of the book of Daniel and the 70 weeks of the Old Testament and that sort of thing. [00:04:48]

Now, it's not that there was never criticism of the Bible prior to the enlightenment, but since the enlightenment there has been a radical escalation of criticism leveled against the believability, the credibility, of the biblical documents. And that attack has not come simply from outside the church, but for the most part in the last century or so the guns of criticism have been leveled against the authority of the Bible from inside the church. [00:05:45]

Now, even more significant than the question of the credibility of the Bible is, of course, the credibility of Christ Himself. Even outside the church there are those who, though they do not accept the deity of Christ, will affirm that He was a great teacher or that He was even a prophet. [00:08:10]

But when we examine the future prophecies of Jesus the critics come to these and say that the prophecies that Jesus made with respect to the future did not come to pass within the specific timeframe that He said they would come to pass. And if that is true, namely, if the prophecies of Jesus fail to come to pass in the timeframes in which He said they would come to pass, that would, bottom line, reduce Jesus to the role of false prophet. [00:08:47]

Russell published a little book entitled, Why I am Not a Christian, and in that book he gave a series of criticisms against historic Christianity, against arguments for the existence of God and so on, but he focused his attention on the central importance of Jesus to historic Christianity. [00:10:10]

Yet, at the same time, Bertrand Russell made a distinction between the real historical Jesus, which he doesn't think we can know, and the Jesus that is presented to us in the literature of the New Testament, particularly in the gospels. Now, he did have some good things to say about Jesus. He had a certain degree of respect for the moral character of Jesus, at least the Jesus who appears in the New Testament documents. [00:12:16]

Now, the three texts that most scholars make reference to and all of which were referred to by Bertrand Russell in his criticism of the New Testament at this point are these: First of all, the statement that Jesus made to His disciples in Matthew 10:23, "You shall not have gone over all the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come." [00:15:54]

Now, here Jesus says that they, namely the disciples, would not finish their missionary outreach beyond the sphere of all of the cities of Israel before the Son of Man, and the Son of Man is a title obviously that is Jesus' favorite self-designation -- He's talking clearly about Himself here -- until the Son of Man be come. [00:16:26]

The way in which evangelical scholars have handled these timeframe references have been in many cases far less than satisfying, and certainly not satisfying to the critics who say that the plain and obvious meaning of Jesus' words in these texts are that He intended to manifest Himself, to come again in glory, within the framework of no longer than a generation, and in Hebrew terms a generation is approximately 40 years. [00:19:43]

Ask a question about this sermon