Engaging Intellectual Diversity in Secular Education
Summary
In today's discussion, I explored the challenges and opportunities present in secular university education, particularly within the humanities and social sciences. The current academic climate often promotes a uniformity of thought, particularly around progressive ideologies, which can stifle genuine intellectual diversity and critical analysis. This environment can lead to moral failures, as illustrated by the story of a student who was mocked by a professor for her pro-life beliefs. Such incidents highlight the need for a more inclusive and respectful dialogue within academic settings.
I also recounted an incident where a professor challenged the prevailing views on same-sex relationships from a conservative Roman Catholic perspective, only to be met with appeals to authority rather than substantive debate. This reflects a broader issue within universities, where the marketplace of ideas has been replaced by a platform for social change, often at the expense of a quality education.
To address these issues, I proposed that we, as Christians, need to be more active as public intellectuals, engaging in discussions that foster moral knowledge. This involves asking fundamental questions about reality, morality, and human flourishing. Engaging with those who hold opposing views can be valuable, not necessarily for changing their minds, but for edifying and strengthening the faith of those observing the dialogue.
Furthermore, I emphasized the importance of finding common ground with secular colleagues, recognizing that some moral knowledge is accessible outside of special revelation. By drawing on philosophical traditions, such as those of Plato and Aristotle, we can translate moral knowledge in ways that resonate with broader audiences. Additionally, empirical data can support the plausibility of philosophical and theological accounts of character traits and their connections to human flourishing.
Finally, I raised a question about the current status of character education in schools, noting a potential decline in its prevalence. This is a crucial area for developing moral character in young people, and it warrants further investigation and support.
Key Takeaways:
- The current academic climate often promotes a uniformity of thought, which can stifle genuine intellectual diversity and critical analysis. This environment can lead to moral failures, as seen in the story of a student mocked for her beliefs. We must strive for a more inclusive and respectful dialogue within academic settings. [02:08]
- Engaging with those who hold opposing views can be valuable, not necessarily for changing their minds, but for edifying and strengthening the faith of those observing the dialogue. This approach can help others see the value of moral knowledge and the Christian perspective. [08:04]
- Finding common ground with secular colleagues is important, as some moral knowledge is accessible outside of special revelation. By drawing on philosophical traditions, we can translate moral knowledge in ways that resonate with broader audiences. [08:55]
- Empirical data can support the plausibility of philosophical and theological accounts of character traits and their connections to human flourishing. This approach can enhance our understanding and justification of Christian virtues like humility, faith, hope, and love. [12:11]
- The current status of character education in schools is crucial for developing moral character in young people. There is a need to investigate and support these programs to ensure they continue to play a vital role in shaping future generations. [14:00]
Youtube Chapters:
[00:00] - Welcome
[00:07] - Introduction to University Challenges
[00:49] - The Issue of Uniformity in Thought
[01:32] - Story of Student Mocked for Beliefs
[03:00] - The Hegemonic Status of Secularism
[03:52] - Incident of Challenging Prevailing Views
[05:37] - The University as a Platform for Change
[06:58] - Restoring Moral Knowledge
[07:21] - Engaging with Opposing Views
[08:55] - Common Ground with Secular Colleagues
[09:23] - Philosophical Traditions and Moral Knowledge
[11:31] - Empirical Data and Christian Virtues
[13:05] - Testing the Christian Way of Life
[14:00] - The Status of Character Education
[14:52] - Conclusion and Encouragement
Study Guide
### Bible Study Discussion Guide
#### Bible Reading
1. Romans 12:2 - "Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will."
2. 1 Peter 3:15 - "But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect."
3. Proverbs 27:17 - "As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another."
#### Observation Questions
1. What challenges did the sermon highlight about the current academic climate in secular universities? [00:49]
2. How did the sermon describe the response of a professor to a student's pro-life beliefs? [01:32]
3. What was the reaction of the university community to the professor who challenged prevailing views on same-sex relationships? [03:52]
4. According to the sermon, what role should Christians play in public intellectual discussions? [07:10]
#### Interpretation Questions
1. How does Romans 12:2 relate to the idea of maintaining intellectual diversity and critical analysis in academic settings?
2. In what ways does 1 Peter 3:15 encourage Christians to engage with those who hold opposing views, as discussed in the sermon? [08:04]
3. How can Proverbs 27:17 be applied to the concept of finding common ground with secular colleagues, as mentioned in the sermon? [08:55]
4. What implications does the sermon suggest about the decline of character education in schools for the development of moral character in young people? [14:00]
#### Application Questions
1. Reflect on a time when you felt your beliefs were mocked or challenged. How did you respond, and what might you do differently in the future to foster respectful dialogue? [01:32]
2. How can you actively participate in discussions that promote moral knowledge and intellectual diversity in your community or workplace? [07:10]
3. Identify a secular colleague or friend with whom you can find common ground. What steps can you take to engage in meaningful conversations about morality and human flourishing? [08:55]
4. Consider the role of empirical data in supporting your faith. How can you use evidence from the world around you to strengthen your understanding and communication of Christian virtues? [12:11]
5. What practical steps can you take to support or advocate for character education in your local schools or community programs? [14:00]
6. How can you prepare yourself to give a reason for your hope in Christ, as encouraged in 1 Peter 3:15, in a way that is gentle and respectful?
7. Think of a person in your life who holds opposing views. What is one specific action you can take this week to engage them in a respectful and edifying conversation?
Devotional
Day 1: Cultivating Intellectual Diversity in Academic Spaces
In today's academic climate, there is often a push towards a uniformity of thought, particularly around progressive ideologies. This can stifle genuine intellectual diversity and critical analysis, leading to moral failures. An example of this is a student who was mocked by a professor for her pro-life beliefs, highlighting the need for more inclusive and respectful dialogue within academic settings. It is crucial to create environments where diverse perspectives are welcomed and debated respectfully, allowing for a richer and more comprehensive understanding of complex issues. [02:08]
"For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. For it is written, 'He catches the wise in their craftiness,' and again, 'The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are futile.'" (1 Corinthians 3:19-20, ESV)
Reflection: Think of a time when you felt your beliefs were dismissed or mocked. How can you create a space for respectful dialogue in your community or workplace today?
Day 2: Engaging in Meaningful Dialogue with Opposing Views
Engaging with those who hold opposing views can be valuable, not necessarily for changing their minds, but for edifying and strengthening the faith of those observing the dialogue. This approach can help others see the value of moral knowledge and the Christian perspective. By engaging in respectful and thoughtful conversations, we can demonstrate the strength and depth of our beliefs, encouraging others to explore and understand different viewpoints. [08:04]
"Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person." (Colossians 4:6, ESV)
Reflection: Identify someone with whom you disagree on a significant issue. How can you initiate a conversation that is both respectful and enlightening for both parties?
Day 3: Finding Common Ground with Secular Colleagues
Finding common ground with secular colleagues is important, as some moral knowledge is accessible outside of special revelation. By drawing on philosophical traditions, such as those of Plato and Aristotle, we can translate moral knowledge in ways that resonate with broader audiences. This approach allows for a shared understanding and appreciation of moral truths, fostering collaboration and mutual respect. [08:55]
"Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?" (2 Corinthians 6:14, ESV)
Reflection: Consider a colleague or friend who does not share your faith. What common values or beliefs can you identify that could serve as a foundation for deeper conversations?
Day 4: The Role of Empirical Data in Understanding Christian Virtues
Empirical data can support the plausibility of philosophical and theological accounts of character traits and their connections to human flourishing. This approach can enhance our understanding and justification of Christian virtues like humility, faith, hope, and love. By integrating empirical evidence with theological insights, we can present a more compelling case for the transformative power of Christian virtues in everyday life. [12:11]
"By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." (John 13:35, ESV)
Reflection: Reflect on a Christian virtue you struggle with. How can you use both empirical evidence and biblical teachings to strengthen this virtue in your life?
Day 5: The Importance of Character Education in Schools
The current status of character education in schools is crucial for developing moral character in young people. There is a need to investigate and support these programs to ensure they continue to play a vital role in shaping future generations. By prioritizing character education, we can equip young people with the moral foundation they need to navigate the complexities of life with integrity and purpose. [14:00]
"Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it." (Proverbs 22:6, ESV)
Reflection: Think about the young people in your life. How can you actively contribute to their moral and character development today?
Quotes
The current academic climate often promotes a uniformity of thought, which can stifle genuine intellectual diversity and critical analysis. This environment can lead to moral failures, as seen in the story of a student mocked for her beliefs. We must strive for a more inclusive and respectful dialogue within academic settings. [00:56:40]
I think this shows a moral failure on the part of the professor of course we all have those but at any rate this one's a little more acceptable these days I think whatever one's definition of a good professor and a good person there should be clear that mocking a student for their political and religious beliefs and such a manner is unacceptable. [02:18:40]
The university is no longer a marketplace of ideas but a platform for some to work for social change so certain programs on my campus talk about their graduates as change agents which I don't have a problem with in a certain sense but there's a program going on right there's a the aim is to get people to go out and do what we want them to do politically and socially. [05:58:17]
I fully agree with the two suggestions in the paper about ways we can help restore it right of course we want to offer a Christian account of the good person and we need to be more active as public intellectuals reaching beyond the university to foster discussion and knowledge related to the kinds of questions that Dallas Willard asked and encouraged us to ask. [07:03:22]
When we do engage people who are really entrenched in a certain view that runs counter to ours, often the value of that is not really for them it's for the people that are on the sidelines watching right so it could be for the for other Christians or Christian students so even though some of these people might be intransigent in their recalcitrance. [07:53:41]
I think our secular colleagues have some access to moral knowledge that is ultimately grounded in the character of God though perhaps that access or that knowledge is indirect in a certain sense this is something we need to make use of as we do our work we can find common ground insofar as there is knowledge about morality human selves human flourishing. [08:47:59]
I think we can translate moral knowledge that's present in oh yeah ultimately grounded in God's character through philosophers like Aristotle and Plato for example and so in a way that we my students don't really care about the forms and good I'm going to talk about the ideal couch they're not too interested but when I just talk about Plato's picture of the good life. [09:14:28]
Empirical knowledge can be useful for particular questions both in moral philosophy and moral theology and so I think the plausibility of philosophical and theological accounts of character traits and their connections to human flourishing can be enhanced or undermined by empirical data but that's because the subject matter is not merely conceptual. [11:34:02]
Humility plays a prominent role in what's called the one contemporary psychological model of personality structure the hexaco model and partially because this honesty humility dimension is present that model has more explanatory power at least according to some humility is also conducive to emotional well-being it's empirically linked with pro-social traits and behaviors. [12:16:10]
We need more of this kind of work on other Christian virtues like faith hope and love at the academic and popular levels and so that I thought of that because when you mentioned that like Christianity right that view of the family in these different ways that it leads to flourishing you can actually test this way of life. [13:00:36]
I just wonder about the current and future status of that because my kids had that and over the past few years I've noticed when I ask my students in class how many of them had these character education programs it seems to me the numbers actually been declining the past three or four years so I'm just curious if that's an I mean of course it's just me. [14:07:10]
I enjoyed the paper very much thought-provoking I was challenged by the paper I was encouraged by the paper and I was actually motivated to go back and help my students players and the people in my life that I love get and live out the moral knowledge they need so thank you for that. [14:46:18]
Chatbot
-
I'm an AI bot trained specifically on the sermon from Jul 26, 2019. Do you have any questions about it?