When two sisters wept over a halved orange, their father learned surface solutions often miss deeper hungers. True conflict resolution begins by asking what each party actually needs beneath their demands. Like the father’s rushed knife-cut, we often default to quick fixes without curiosity. But wisdom grows when we pause to ask, “What story lives beneath this struggle?” Jesus modeled this by asking questions that revealed hearts before offering answers. Lasting peace comes through patient listening, not hasty verdicts. [44:00]
“To answer before listening— that is folly and shame.”
(Proverbs 18:13, NIV)
Reflection: Recall a conflict where a surface-level “solution” worsened tensions. What deeper need might have gone unheard beneath the initial demand?
The Quaker clearness committee reveals how open-ended questions—not advice—help people hear the Holy Spirit within. Parker Palmer’s committee exposed his ego’s craving for prestige, redirecting him toward vocational integrity. Like Jesus asking, “What do you want me to do for you?” such questions create space for self-discovery. They honor the Spirit’s work in others by refusing to manipulate outcomes. True dialogue begins when we trade prescriptions for curiosity. [52:03]
“Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone.”
(Colossians 3:14-15, NIV)
Reflection: What open-ended question could you ask someone this week to help them—and you—listen for the Spirit’s whisper beneath their stance?
A couple’s tension over punctuality shifted when they named their “problem” as differing cultural scripts, not personal failure. By externalizing the conflict—making it “Stith Standard Time” versus “five minutes early”—they became allies solving a shared puzzle. Jesus redefined enemies as neighbors through the Good Samaritan story, redirecting focus from labels to shared humanity. Conflicts lose their venom when we attack issues, not image-bearers. [48:31]
“My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry.”
(James 1:19, NIV)
Reflection: Where might reframing a conflict as an “it” to solve together—rather than a “you” to fix—heal a strained relationship?
A denominational split erupted when some framed LGBTQ inclusion as holiness abandoned, while others saw it as love expanded. Like the pastor who referred the dying couple instead of condemning them, grace thrives when we hold convictions without weaponizing them. Jesus dined with sinners without compromising truth, showing holiness as magnetic love, not exclusionary fear. Unity grows when we ask, “How does God’s heart break here?” [36:20]
“Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.”
(1 Peter 4:8, NIV)
Reflection: When have you witnessed love bridging a doctrinal divide? How might perfect love cast out fear in your current tensions?
Einstein’s rumored 55-minute problem-defining habit mirrors Proverbs’ call to seek understanding before speaking. The father with the orange, the clearness committee, and Braver Angels’ voter integrity dialogues all prove solutions follow clarity. Jesus, wisdom incarnate, asked “Who do you say I am?” before building His church. Our polarized world needs Christians who define problems with others, not for them. [45:23]
“The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom. Though it cost all you have, get understanding.”
(Proverbs 4:7, NIV)
Reflection: What current conflict tempts you to rush to solutions? How might patiently defining the problem with others honor Christ as the true unifier?
Grace refuses to rush past conscience in the name of being right. The call to love makes room for someone who is “as close as I’ve ever been” yet cannot cross a line today, trusting that honest struggle can ripen into change tomorrow. The split within the church keeps missing each other because the problem gets named in different ways. Holiness gets defined by some as the policing of bodies, while John Wesley’s old path names holiness as perfect love of God and neighbor with heart, soul, mind, and strength. Inclusivity names God’s love as big enough to hold people who disagree, and big enough to hold LGBTQ daughters and sons in covenant fidelity.
Proverbs steps in as a school of wisdom, the oldest kind of teaching, crafted into lines a child can remember. Lady Wisdom stands in the street and says, walk the road that leads to life. Jesus sounds like Wisdom when he says, let those who have ears listen, and shines like Wisdom when he says, I am the way, the truth, and the life. Knowledge, says Proverbs, listens before it answers. Fools do not seek to understand. They just have opinions. That diagnosis lands hard in a culture driven by anxiety and hot takes.
The orange story shows how quick fixes fail when the real problem is misnamed. Half an orange for each child looks fair, but it solves nothing if one needs zest and the other needs juice. The practice of defining the conflict together turns opponents into partners. The conflict becomes an object on the table, not a label on a person. Different understandings of time do not make a husband the problem; they invite a shared plan that honors different temperaments.
Open ended questions dig beneath positions to values and stories. What is important here. What would happen if you were wrong. What lies underneath this conviction. A clearness committee trusts that the Holy Spirit lives in each person, and that a circle of honest questions helps a soul hear what it already knows. Parker Palmer’s story exposes how ego can chase a title while a better question asks whether a role fits gifts. The Spirit keeps nudging the room to ask the right question first.
Braver Angels models neutral framing so red and blue can sit down, define one shared problem, and craft solutions that take both sides seriously. Hope in Jesus believes this kind of patient listening can change the tenor of a whole culture, not by winning faster, but by understanding deeper.
And what would happen if you could see the problem as something outside of yourself and not something that is yourself or the other person? See, I think if we follow those types of practices, we can change the tenor of our whole culture from one of polarization, meaning you believe this and therefore, I don't like this, so I hate you, to one that says, we have an issue.
[00:57:02]
(31 seconds)
#ProblemNotPerson
And one of the issues that that the open ended questions really help us get to is the fact that oftentimes, we equate what we think with who we are. So if someone attacks my position on something, they're attacking me. But that's not true. And when you take the the time to ask these deeper questions, to define the problem or to understand the conflict, then you can get to what's really going on, and you can preserve the relationship.
[00:55:55]
(36 seconds)
#SeparateBeliefFromIdentity
And the really cool thing is when Beau and I have were taught how to do marriage counseling, one of the things that they taught us was that if you can get a couple together to define the conflict together, you help them understand that the conflict is not one or the other of them. The conflict is something that's going on between them, but it's not them. So it's something kind of outside of them, and then they're on the same team trying to solve it.
[00:46:03]
(33 seconds)
#ConflictIsBetweenUs
And when you do that, you you all of a sudden, you've you've already created a win because you've defined the problem the same. So it's like, oh, good. We're on the same team, and we can define the problem the same way. So now we can use those same skills to get at some healthy solutions. And those skills involve listening and that deep listening of asking things like, why is this important to you?
[00:49:44]
(25 seconds)
#DeepListeningWins
And, you know, I am an eternal optimist because of the hope I have in Jesus. And so I wanna invite you to think about a conflict that you're experiencing now and to think about what would happen if you could, together with the other person or persons, define the conflict, define the problem. And what would happen if, instead of trying to get to the answer real quickly, you instead asked deeper, open ended questions.
[00:56:31]
(31 seconds)
#SlowDownAskWhy
I got a call from a colleague this week who had received a call from a member of the community. And this woman was older, and she had been together with her partner for forty years, but they had never gotten married. And her partner had now been diagnosed with a terminal illness and was on hospice. And they wanted to get married to just celebrate the love that had been a part of their life for so long. But he is a still a member of the United Methodist Church, but a little more on the conservative side.
[00:33:28]
(42 seconds)
#CompassionOverPolicy
And so it turns out there was a very good, healthy, clear solution if he had taken the time to understand understand the problem. And so it invites us to really listen and try to seek that knowledge instead of just looking at defining the problem on the surface level. And that requires us to keep digging deeper. Why is it that people feel this way? What is going on?
[00:44:36]
(30 seconds)
#DigForUnderstanding
So they're arguing back and forth, I want the orange. I want the orange. I want the orange. No. It's mine. It's mine. It's mine. I'm the older. I'm the younger. the father hears this and comes in, takes a knife, cuts the orange in half, and gives it to them, upon which each of them bursts into tears and runs to their room. And he's like, okay. That clearly did not solve the problem.
[00:43:46]
(25 seconds)
#SolveTheRightProblem
I'm an AI bot trained specifically on the sermon from Jun 08, 2026. Do you have any questions about it?
Add this chatbot onto your site with the embed code below
<iframe frameborder="0" src="https://pastors.ai/sermonWidget/sermon/conflict-repair-wisdom" width="100%" height="100%" style="height:100vh;"></iframe>Copy