The Bible Jesus Read

Devotional

Day 1: The Bible Jesus Read: Affirming the Jewish Canon

Jesus never argued with Jewish leaders about which books belonged in Scripture. He treated their Bible as authoritative, quoting it extensively and anchoring his mission in its promises. His silence on adding or removing books speaks volumes—he endorsed the 39-book Hebrew canon we have today. This three-part collection (Law, Prophets, Writings) shaped his teaching and rebuked religious hypocrisy. When he declared Scripture’s fulfillment, he pointed to this exact canon, not later additions. [10:12]

“These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures. (Luke 24:44-45, ESV)

Reflection: How does Jesus’ full acceptance of the Hebrew Scriptures challenge modern doubts about the Old Testament’s relevance? What would change if you viewed every page of your Bible as Jesus viewed his?

Day 2: Law, Prophets, Psalms: The Threefold Anchor

The Jewish Bible’s structure—Torah, Nevi’im, Ketuvim—framed Jesus’ understanding of God’s story. He invoked this three-part division after his resurrection, showing how Moses’ laws, the prophets’ visions, and the Psalms’ poetry all pointed to him. This wasn’t a random arrangement but a deliberate testimony to Messiah’s coming. The order mattered: Chronicles’ placement at the end shaped how Jews (and Jesus) interpreted judgment and hope. [11:12]

“He said to them, ‘This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.’” (Luke 24:44, ESV)

Reflection: When have you overlooked “difficult” Old Testament books? How might Jesus’ use of the full canon deepen your appreciation for Scripture’s unity?

Day 3: No Apocrypha on Jesus’ Lips

Though surrounded by intertestamental writings like Maccabees and Enoch, Jesus never quoted them as Scripture. The New Testament authors followed his example—295 Old Testament citations, zero Apocryphal references as divine authority. Even Jude’s allusion to Enoch (Jude 14-15) doesn’t elevate it to Scripture’s level. Jesus’ Bible stayed fixed at Malachi, affirming that God’s authoritative voice ceased until John the Baptist. [16:35]

“All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (2 Timothy 3:16-17, ESV)

Reflection: What modern “additions” to Scripture subtly compete for your trust? How does Jesus’ exclusive use of the Hebrew canon guard you from false authority?

Day 4: From Abel to Zechariah: Canonical Bookends

By referencing Abel’s murder (Genesis) and Zechariah’s death (2 Chronicles), Jesus revealed his acceptance of the Hebrew canon’s book order. In the Jewish arrangement, Chronicles closed the Scriptures—making Zechariah the final martyr in the canonical timeline. This wasn’t historical oversight but theological intentionality: Jesus held the whole story accountable to God’s covenant promises. [13:04]

“The blood of all the prophets…may be charged against this generation, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who perished between the altar and the sanctuary.” (Luke 11:50-51, ESV)

Reflection: Where do you struggle to see Scripture’s unity? How might Jesus’ view of Genesis-to-Chronicles as one coherent story reshape your Bible reading?

Day 5: Esther’s Unnamed God and Unshaken Providence

Esther’s absence of God’s name doesn’t negate His presence—it amplifies His hidden work. Jesus’ canon included this politically risky book because it reveals providence in exile. Every plot twist—sleepless kings, timing, reversals—shouts God’s sovereignty without saying His name. For persecuted believers, Esther’s silence became a shout: God rules even when He seems absent. [20:22]

“Who knows whether you have not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?” (Esther 4:14, ESV)

Reflection: When has God felt absent in your story? How might Esther’s unspoken providence encourage you to trust His unseen hand today?

Sermon Summary

The question of canon asks which books function as the rule, the measuring stick, the authoritative standard for life, worldview, principles, and truth. The Old Testament canon, on this argument, includes the 39 books received in the church’s English Bible, no more, even though the Hebrew Bible counted them as 24 by grouping books together.

Jewish understanding between the testaments matters because Jesus came into a world where the Scriptures already had a recognized shape. The rabbis spoke as though, after Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi, “the Holy Spirit departed from Israel.” First Maccabees reflects the same sense, since certain matters had to wait “until there should come a prophet.” That atmosphere shows that the Jews were not just letting any old claim into the Bible. The Apocrypha and other intertestamental writings existed, but the Jewish people did not give them the same authority as the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings.

The Hebrew canon had three sections, Torah, Nevi’im, and Ketuvim, summed up as Tanakh. The Law had Genesis through Deuteronomy. The Prophets included Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Twelve. The Writings included Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah, and Chronicles. That order matters because the Jewish Bible began with Genesis and ended with Chronicles.

Jesus’ own words strongly point to that same canon. Luke 24 speaks of “the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms,” which every Jew would hear as the whole Jewish Bible. Jesus did not correct their canon, add the Apocrypha, or say their Bible had misleading books in it. “There is no record of any dispute” between Jesus and the Jewish leaders over the extent of Scripture. He seemed to assume that their Bible was his Bible.

Luke 11 makes the point even sharper. Jesus speaks of the blood of the prophets from Abel to Zechariah. Historically, Zechariah is not the last martyr in the Old Testament timeline, but canonically he is the last martyr in the Hebrew order, since his death appears in Chronicles. Jesus is not tracing a mere timeline of events. He is speaking from the first martyr to the last martyr in the Jewish canon.

The New Testament then quotes the Old Testament as divine authority nearly 300 times, but never treats the Apocrypha that way. Jude may quote Enoch, and Paul may quote pagan poets, but quoting a book does not make it Scripture. Even Esther, though God is never named in it, displays God everywhere, especially in exile, where God may look absent and yet is never absent.

##

Key Takeaways

1. Jesus trusted a definite Bible Christ did not treat Scripture as a foggy collection with uncertain edges. His words assume a recognized Jewish canon, and no dispute appears between him and the Jewish leaders over which books counted as Scripture. The Christian’s confidence in the Old Testament rests first on Jesus’ own confidence in the Bible he received and fulfilled. [10:12]
2. Canon means measuring rod The canon is not merely a religious library or a set of helpful old books. The canon is the rule, the measuring stick, the stock of writings that judges life, philosophy, worldview, standards, and hope. A person who receives Scripture as canon is not adding Bible verses to an already settled life, but submitting the whole life to God’s authoritative word. [01:09]
3. Silence after Malachi mattered The Jewish conviction that prophecy had ceased after the latter prophets guarded the people from treating later writings as equal to God’s inspired word. That silence did not mean God was absent or inactive, but it did mean that authoritative prophetic Scripture had reached a recognized boundary. Carefulness about canon is therefore not unbelief, but reverence for the difference between God’s word and every other word. [04:07]
4. Jesus read canonically, not loosely Jesus’ phrase “from Abel to Zechariah” makes best sense in the order of the Hebrew Bible, from Genesis to Chronicles. That line shows that Jesus was thinking in terms of the Jewish canonical order, not merely a historical timeline. The details of Scripture’s shape mattered to him, down to the way the books themselves framed the blood of the prophets. [13:04]
5. God can be verbally absent Esther never names God, yet God is “all over this place.” The sleepless king, the opened record, the perfectly timed entrance of Haman, and the honoring of Mordecai all reveal providence without spelling it out. In exile, God may look absent, but the hidden hand can be more powerful precisely because every turn of the story exposes it.

## [21:31]

Youtube Chapters

[00:00] - Welcome
[01:09] - What Canon Means
[02:21] - The Aim: 39 Old Testament Books
[03:06] - Jewish Writings Between the Testaments
[04:07] - Prophecy Ceased After Malachi
[06:05] - The Hebrew Canon and Tanakh
[08:16] - Why the Order Matters
[09:06] - New Testament Pointers to the Canon
[10:12] - Jesus Assumed Their Bible
[11:12] - Law, Prophets, and Psalms
[13:04] - From Abel to Zechariah
[16:19] - No Apocrypha Cited as Scripture
[18:29] - Early Christian Witness
[20:22] - Esther and God’s Hidden Providence

Bible Study Guide

Bible Reading

Luke 11:49-51
“Therefore also the Wisdom of God said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and persecute,’ so that the blood of all the prophets, shed from the foundation of the world, may be charged against this generation, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who perished between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, it will be required of this generation.” [13:04]

Luke 24:44
“Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.’” [11:12]

2 Timothy 3:15
“and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” [09:33]

Observation questions

In Luke 24:44, what three parts of Scripture does Jesus name, and how does that match the Jewish way of speaking about the Old Testament? [11:12]
In Luke 11:49-51, which two people mark the beginning and end of the line Jesus mentions, and why is Zechariah especially important in this argument? [13:04]
In 2 Timothy 3:15, how does Paul speak about the “sacred writings,” and what does that suggest about whether those writings were seen as a known and recognized body of Scripture? [09:33]
What are some examples of God’s hidden providence in Esther, even though God is never directly named in the book? [21:31]

Interpretation questions

If Jesus speaks of “the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms,” what does that suggest about how definite the Old Testament was in his day? Why does that matter for confidence in Scripture now? [10:12]
Jesus speaks of the blood “from Abel to Zechariah.” Why does that make better sense as a statement about the shape of the canon rather than just a simple historical timeline? [13:04]
Paul says the sacred writings are able to make a person wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. How does that help explain why the question of canon is more than a debate about ancient books?
The New Testament may quote non-biblical sources at times, but it does not treat the Apocrypha as divine authority. Why is that difference important when thinking about what counts as Scripture? [16:19]

Application questions

Canon means measuring rod, not just a shelf of religious books. Where is there pressure in life right now to let something else set the standard for beliefs, decisions, or priorities? [01:09]
Jesus trusted a definite Bible. Does that strengthen confidence in the Old Testament, or are there still hesitations or questions that need to be worked through honestly as a group? [10:12]
The silence after Malachi shows a carefulness not to call every religious writing the word of God. In a time when many voices claim authority, how can a believer grow in reverence for the difference between God’s word and every other word? [04:07]
Jesus read Scripture with attention to its shape and order. What would it look like to read the Bible less casually and with more care, even in ordinary personal reading? [13:04]
Esther shows that God can seem absent while still ruling every detail. Where has life recently felt confusing, delayed, or hidden, and how might faith look for God’s hand there? [21:31]
God is not always loud in a season of exile, suffering, or waiting. When has God seemed silent, and what helped keep trust alive in that season? [23:21]
The sacred writings are able to make people wise for salvation through faith in Christ. What habits could help a person move from merely knowing Bible content to actually receiving Scripture as life-giving and saving truth? [09:33]

Sermon Clips

"Which books make up the Bible and why? We talk about the Old Testament canon and the New Testament canon. And and what we mean by canon which means rule, measuring stick is that the canon is the limit of the books that function as the measuring rod of your life and your philosophy and your world view and your principles and standards." [00:01:09]

"There is no record of any dispute between Jesus and the Jewish leaders of his day over what the extent of the scriptures was. He seemed to assume that their Bible was his Bible. And he made remarkable claims about its authority. We're going to talk about that later where we where we show how Jesus credits the Old Testament." [00:10:09]

"According to one count by Roger Nicole, the New Testament quotes various parts of the Old Testament as divinely authoritative over 295 times. But not once do they cite any statement from the books of the Apocrypha or any other writings as having divine authority." [00:16:15]

"It looks as if God is absent lots of times and he's never absent. And that's the point of making him verbally absent in a story where he's in every paragraph. I think that's that's my guess as to why the writer did it the way he did it. But I have to admit it created problems for the book of Esther getting into the cannon." [00:23:25]

"But if you take the Jewish cannon which ends with the book of Chronicles, Zechariah is the last one recorded. So what Jesus is doing here is not saying I'm thinking on a historical timeline. I'm thinking on a canonical timeline. I'm saying if you take the whole Old Testament as you Jews embrace it, the first martyr mentioned and the last martyr mentioned, all that blood's going to come upon you." [00:14:07]

"And therefore, this is a very strong argument that it was the Jewish canon that Jesus was dealing with and that whenever he quoted the Old Testament, whenever he said the scriptures are fulfilled in me, he wasn't thinking apocrypha or pseudapigrapher or intertestamental writings or the Septuagent. He was thinking of that strict and carefully defined Jewish cannon." [00:14:44]

"The three-part Jewish division of the Old Testament was assumed by Jesus. It looks like for example Luke 24:44. Now he said to them, this is after his resurrection. These are my words which I spoke to you while I was still with you that all things which are written about me in the law of Moses and the prophets and the psalms must be fulfilled." [00:11:02]

"In other words, the Jews operated on the assumption inspiration stopped with Malachi. So what was included then? because that obviously shows they care about not just letting any old claim during the interpestamental period qualify as authoritative. They want to discern well what can we go to for God's word if we don't go to Mcabes and Edris and addition to Esther and Ecclesiasticus. What do we go to?" [00:05:36]

"Now I know it says psalms instead of writings but that was not unusual to take the main central writing book and use it as the name over the whole group right the writings i.e the psalms. So, he's got this three-fold thing that fits exactly with the Jewish understanding of the Old Testament, which causes you I mean, every Jew who read this would ignore exactly what he's saying. They'd say, "Oh, he's talking about the whole Old Testament. All the things written about me in our Jewish Old Testament."" [00:11:26]

"That becomes very significant for something Jesus said that tips us off that Jesus used the Hebrew canon and endorsed it as canon rather than the Septuagent which has apocryphal books in it. Septuagent is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament translated sometime in the intertestamental period probably in Egypt by the Alexandrian Greekeaking Jews and they added some of the apocryphal books and they changed the order so that the order was like ours." [00:08:19]

"So when he writes to Timothy whose mother is Jewish, whose dad is is Greek, he he refers without explanation to the the sacred writings. And you know he's not talking about the Greek gods who might have a few sacred writings circulating around. He's talking about a a set group of writings. So he's assuming there was something fixed and set in the Jewish community." [00:09:41]

"The Hebrew cannon has traditionally had 24 books which include all of our 39 and no more. And these are divided into three sections. The reason the number is different is because they lumped some together that we break out. They're divided into three sections. Law, prophets, writings, summed up as the Tanakh." [00:06:05]

"And we'll start with the Old Testament and then I've got one on the on the New Testament. So, I'm going to try to develop an argument that the 39 books of the Old Testament are the only books that should be credited as part of the Bible and therefore inspired and reliable." [00:02:19]

"Here's the fourth observation. the Jewish order of the closed Jewish cannon. Closed meaning they're not going to add any more books to this that come along later after Malachi is assumed by Jesus. The Jewish order is assumed by Jesus. Now here comes that issue about the last book of the writings and thus the last book of the old testament in the Jewish order not the septuagent and not our bible was chronicles." [00:12:04]

"Jewish books besides the ones we have in our Old Testament were written after the Old Testament times, for example. And then there's a list of them right there. Apocrypha, pseudapigria, Ezras, Tobit, Judith, book of addition to Esther, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Barrack and so on. The Jews did not accord to the Apocrypha the authority of the econical books." [00:03:13]

Ask a question about this sermon

Desiring God This sermon · AI assistant

Why did Jesus rely on the Hebrew canon?

Why does Esther omit the word God?

What disqualifies Apocrypha from scripture authority?