The sermon explores the complex relationship between civil righteousness and spiritual righteousness, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balance between the two. The speaker begins by acknowledging the intertwined nature of these aspects in our lives, but stresses the need to keep them distinct. They argue that neither our confidence in spiritual righteousness nor our civil righteousness should overshadow the other, as both are integral parts of who we are. However, they also recognize that the overlap between these two areas can become convoluted, and that our spiritual side should ultimately prevail. By fulfilling our spiritual calling and working towards God's justice, we can bring about positive change in the civil system.
The speaker then delves into the concept of righteousness according to Martin Luther, who distinguishes between civil righteousness, achieved through our actions in society, and spiritual righteousness, which pertains to our relationship with God. Our spiritual righteousness, they explain, is not determined by our actions, but rather by God's love in Christ. This righteousness is referred to as "alien righteousness" because it is a gift from God and cannot be earned. The speaker encourages the congregation to reflect on their own motivations and whether they are more concerned with how they appear to others or with honoring God.
The speaker shares a personal anecdote about struggling with obeying speed limits on the way to an event, using it as an example of how our righteousness in the civil realm is earned or not earned based on following the law. They emphasize that our sense of what is right in the world should come from God, and while we owe society what it demands of us, we owe God even more. They use the current immigration debate as an example of how civil disobedience may be seen as civil righteousness in some cases. However, they caution that there are traps in thinking that confuse societal righteousness with spiritual righteousness, and it can be difficult to discern where the line is between a proper civil response and a proper spiritual response.
The speaker continues to explore the balance between civil righteousness and spiritual righteousness, highlighting the idea that our sense of what is right in the world should come from God, while also acknowledging our obligations to society. They caution against confusing societal righteousness with spiritual righteousness, especially in the context of churches taking an active role in pursuing justice. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in determining where the line is and whether one is on, over, or nowhere near it.
Finally, the speaker reflects on the tendency to try and align Jesus with a particular political party. They argue that our desire to place Jesus in a box that aligns with our own beliefs says more about us than about who Jesus truly is. They believe that Jesus evades this trap by discussing righteousness in a way that transcends political affiliations.
Key Takeaways
Youtube Chapters